Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This study introduces the Agentic Adoption Index (AAI) by analyzing 53,000 agent configurations to distinguish between theoretical AI exposure and actual task delegation in workflows. The research reveals that adoption peaks at the bachelor's level rather than among highly educated professionals, suggesting that factors beyond technical feasibility—such as professional discretion or difficulty in codifying tasks—drive adoption patterns. These findings offer a critical refinement for understanding real-world agentic integration and its economic impact across occupations.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, Latent Space, InfoQ
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Who Delegates to AI? Evidence from 53,000 Agent Configurations

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.20425v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A growing literature measures how far occupations are exposed to AI, but these measures capture where AI could perform tasks, not whether workers have adopted it. We propose a new layer of exposure, delegated exposure, which records whether a worker has committed a task to AI by building it into a workflow. We operationalize it as the Agentic Adoption Index (AAI), which measures how closely an occupation's tasks match the agentic routines practitioners have already built and shared. We embed roughly 53,000 agent skill specifications from the Manus Skills Marketplace, compute their semantic similarity to about 18,000 O*NET task statements, and aggregate to the occupation level. Three findings follow. First, the occupations where delegation concentrates differ sharply from those pre-AI frameworks identified as most at risk. Second, the AAI tracks what AI could do more closely than what workers currently use it for. Third, the AAI peaks below the top of the wage distribution and at the bachelor's level, declining at both extremes. Technical availability explains most of this variation, but not the shortfall among the most educated occupations, so feasibility alone cannot account for who adopts. That shortfall may reflect work that resists advance specification, or professional discretion over the pace of codification. Distinguishing the two, and tracking how these measures diverge over time, will require repeated measurement.

Title:Who Delegates to AI? Evidence from 53,000 Agent Configurations

Abstract:A growing literature measures how far occupations are exposed to AI, but these measures capture where AI could perform tasks, not whether workers have adopted it. We propose a new layer of exposure, delegated exposure, which records whether a worker has committed a task to AI by building it into a workflow. We operationalize it as the Agentic Adoption Index (AAI), which measures how closely an occupation's tasks match the agentic routines practitioners have already built and shared. We embed roughly 53,000 agent skill specifications from the Manus Skills Marketplace, compute their semantic similarity to about 18,000 O*NET task statements, and aggregate to the occupation level. Three findings follow. First, the occupations where delegation concentrates differ sharply from those pre-AI frameworks identified as most at risk. Second, the AAI tracks what AI could do more closely than what workers currently use it for. Third, the AAI peaks below the top of the wage distribution and at the bachelor's level, declining at both extremes. Technical availability explains most of this variation, but not the shortfall among the most educated occupations, so feasibility alone cannot account for who adopts. That shortfall may reflect work that resists advance specification, or professional discretion over the pace of codification. Distinguishing the two, and tracking how these measures diverge over time, will require repeated measurement.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)

arXiv:2608.20425 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2608.20425v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20425 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 326 words

Related coverage