aiqbench analysis
This paper shows that a classical local algorithm (VIRAL) beats the best published QAOA-based lower bounds on Max-Cut for 3-regular graphs of large girth, raising the asymptotic bound from 0.912 to 0.9127. For quantum readers, it is a useful reminder that claims of quantum advantage on optimization tasks need to be checked against strong classical baselines, which can move quickly. The result is a benchmark update rather than evidence for or against quantum speedup.
Whither quantum advantage? New classical lower bounds for Max-Cut on large-girth 3-regular graphs
arXiv:2610.17236v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Every 3-regular graph of girth at least $g$ has a cut containing at least a fraction $M_g$ of its edges, and the best rigorous bounds at large girth are $0.912\le \lim_{g\to\infty}M_g \le 0.92386$. Lower bounds on $M_g$ follow from the performance of local algorithms: on a graph of girth $g \ge 2p+2$ a depth-$p$ local algorithm sees the same tree around every edge, so its expected cut fraction on that tree bounds $M_g$ from below. We apply this strategy to the Variational Iterative Rotation Algorithm (VIRAL), a classical local algorithm, and evaluate it on the depth-$p$ tree for every even depth up to $p=32$. The resulting bounds exceed those recently obtained from the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) for every $p\ge 4$, by $0.005$ to $0.011$, and they extend the range of girths covered from $g=36$ to $g=66$. Notably, at $g=66$ we obtain $M_{66} \ge 0.9127$ at $99.99999\%$ confidence level, which raises the asymptotic lower bound from $0.912$ to $0.9127$.
Title:Whither quantum advantage? New classical lower bounds for Max-Cut on large-girth 3-regular graphs
Abstract:Every 3-regular graph of girth at least $g$ has a cut containing at least a fraction $M_g$ of its edges, and the best rigorous bounds at large girth are $0.912\le \lim_{g\to\infty}M_g \le 0.92386$. Lower bounds on $M_g$ follow from the performance of local algorithms: on a graph of girth $g \ge 2p+2$ a depth-$p$ local algorithm sees the same tree around every edge, so its expected cut fraction on that tree bounds $M_g$ from below. We apply this strategy to the Variational Iterative Rotation Algorithm (VIRAL), a classical local algorithm, and evaluate it on the depth-$p$ tree for every even depth up to $p=32$. The resulting bounds exceed those recently obtained from the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) for every $p\ge 4$, by $0.005$ to $0.011$, and they extend the range of girths covered from $g=36$ to $g=66$. Notably, at $g=66$ we obtain $M_{66} \ge 0.9127$ at $99.99999\%$ confidence level, which raises the asymptotic lower bound from $0.912$ to $0.9127$.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Disordered Systems and Neural Networks (cond-mat.dis-nn); Combinatorics (math.CO)
arXiv:2610.17236 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.17236v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17236 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 275 words
Related coverage

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · Aug 4, 2026

PGLib Rules Out Quantum Power Flow Advantage at Every Readout Level
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 11, 2026

Quantum Computers Speed up Network Analysis by Listing Triangles Faster
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jun 15, 2026

Bringing Classical LDPC Code Design Theory to Quantum Computers
The Quantum Insider · Sep 9, 2026