aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a universal framework for comparing the power outputs of four distinct quantum Otto engine implementations by factorizing performance into characteristic work and time scales. The study reveals that maximum operating speed is fundamentally limited by thermalization timescales, with dynamical sequences determining whether power output follows linear or quadratic scaling laws. These findings provide critical insights into optimizing the operational limits of quantum heat engines for future quantum thermodynamic applications.
Which Otto Engine Is the Fastest?
arXiv:2609.00321v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A general thermal machine is characterized by distinct time or energy scales: temperature, coupling to the heat baths, internal free dynamics and interactions, and external driving. We address the question: what parameters determine the speed of a given engine, and how can they be used to reliably compare different types of engine? Specifically, we consider four realizations of the Otto engine, each operating with the same Otto efficiency, and aim to characterize and compare their power outputs. The main insight of this paper is that, irrespective of their very different dynamical implementations, the power of each engine can be factorized into a common characteristic work and an implementation-specific characteristic time. The characteristic work depends only on the internal frequencies of the machine and the temperatures, whereas the characteristic time depends on the coupling strength to the baths and on the implementation-specific driving. This observation allows us to compare the power of different engines through their characteristic times and thereby reduce the relevant parameter space to parameters that capture the dynamical aspects of engine performance. Despite different dynamical implementations, this framework reveals simple common features. In all cases, the maximum operating speed is limited by a common timescale given by the sum of the characteristic thermalization times of the hot and cold baths. Moreover, the four engines fall into two distinct asymptotic classes: implementations in which driving and thermalization occur simultaneously exhibit quadratic scaling, whereas those in which work extraction and thermalization alternate exhibit linear scaling. These results expose general dynamical features that determine the operational speed of quantum Otto engines.
Title:Which Otto Engine Is the Fastest?
Abstract:A general thermal machine is characterized by distinct time or energy scales: temperature, coupling to the heat baths, internal free dynamics and interactions, and external driving. We address the question: what parameters determine the speed of a given engine, and how can they be used to reliably compare different types of engine? Specifically, we consider four realizations of the Otto engine, each operating with the same Otto efficiency, and aim to characterize and compare their power outputs. The main insight of this paper is that, irrespective of their very different dynamical implementations, the power of each engine can be factorized into a common characteristic work and an implementation-specific characteristic time. The characteristic work depends only on the internal frequencies of the machine and the temperatures, whereas the characteristic time depends on the coupling strength to the baths and on the implementation-specific driving. This observation allows us to compare the power of different engines through their characteristic times and thereby reduce the relevant parameter space to parameters that capture the dynamical aspects of engine performance. Despite different dynamical implementations, this framework reveals simple common features. In all cases, the maximum operating speed is limited by a common timescale given by the sum of the characteristic thermalization times of the hot and cold baths. Moreover, the four engines fall into two distinct asymptotic classes: implementations in which driving and thermalization occur simultaneously exhibit quadratic scaling, whereas those in which work extraction and thermalization alternate exhibit linear scaling. These results expose general dynamical features that determine the operational speed of quantum Otto engines.
arXiv:2609.00321 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.00321v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00321 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 357 words
Related coverage
Squeezing-Fueled Quantum Otto Engine via Measurement-Induced Cooling: The Two-Qubit Quantum Rabi Model
arXiv · Aug 4, 2026
Reverse-Engineering hipBLASLt TensileLite Kernels: From Solution Name to a Tuning Config
AMD · Aug 4, 2026

The Pros and Cons of Job Hopping as an Engineer
IEEE Spectrum · Jun 9, 2026
Quantum Otto engine powered by an anisotropic Heisenberg XYZ model under independent local magnetic fields
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026