Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates how the choice of language for reasoning skeletons impacts multilingual mathematical performance in large language models, challenging the assumption that English is universally optimal. The study reveals that while English often provides a slight edge for smaller models and low-resource languages, these gains are context-dependent and not significant across all benchmarks after rigorous correction. Ultimately, skeleton language should be treated as a critical design variable requiring multi-level exploration rather than a fixed default.
Sources coveringarXiv, Latent Space, Hugging Face
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Which Language Should a Skeleton Speak? Language Choices in Multilingual Reasoning

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.09607v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Skeleton-based reasoning prompting is a promising training-free approach for structuring LLM reasoning, but prior work largely assumes an English-centric setting. We propose the Language-Aware Skeleton Exploration Framework (LASEF) to study skeleton-language choice in multilingual mathematical reasoning. Across math benchmarks, model scales, and languages, we show that English skeletons yield a small positive tendency on average, most visible for smaller models and low-resource languages. However, few language-level gains remain significant after correction, and English is not universally optimal. Combining greedy decoding, multi-rollout evaluation, translation ablation, and cross-benchmark validation, we further find three patterns of skeleton-language effects: directionally consistent, evaluation- and benchmark-dependent, and asymmetric negative. These effects cannot be fully explained by generation quality alone. Overall, skeleton language is a context-dependent design variable that requires multi-level exploration. All resources are released at https://github.com/lhsstn/LASEF.

Title:Which Language Should a Skeleton Speak? Language Choices in Multilingual Reasoning

Abstract:Skeleton-based reasoning prompting is a promising training-free approach for structuring LLM reasoning, but prior work largely assumes an English-centric setting. We propose the Language-Aware Skeleton Exploration Framework (LASEF) to study skeleton-language choice in multilingual mathematical reasoning. Across math benchmarks, model scales, and languages, we show that English skeletons yield a small positive tendency on average, most visible for smaller models and low-resource languages. However, few language-level gains remain significant after correction, and English is not universally optimal. Combining greedy decoding, multi-rollout evaluation, translation ablation, and cross-benchmark validation, we further find three patterns of skeleton-language effects: directionally consistent, evaluation- and benchmark-dependent, and asymmetric negative. These effects cannot be fully explained by generation quality alone. Overall, skeleton language is a context-dependent design variable that requires multi-level exploration. All resources are released at this https URL.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.09607 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.09607v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.09607 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 242 words

Related coverage