Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research identifies a linear steering direction in LLM residual streams that effectively resolves conflicts between internal parametric knowledge and external context. By generalizing this control vector across diverse tasks like RAG, memory, and rule following, the study demonstrates a robust method to prioritize prompt-provided information over model weights. This finding offers a practical mechanism for improving reliability in retrieval-augmented generation and other systems requiring dynamic knowledge selection.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Which Knowledge Should LLMs Trust? Uncovering a Generalizable Steering Direction Across Knowledge Conflicts

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.20067v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently encounter conflicts between internal parametric knowledge and external contextual knowledge, yet the mechanisms governing this selection remain unclear. We show that the choice between context and parametric knowledge is linearly represented and can be controlled along a single direction in the model's residual stream. We first demonstrate that this direction generalizes across factual-conflict settings, including context formats, knowledge categories, and datasets, while consistently shifting behavior between parametric and contextual answers. We then transfer a direction learned from simple factual conflicts to three more complex task families: RAG, memory, and rule following, where models must acquire information from retrieved documents, interaction histories, or explicit rules. Across four model families and multiple transfer settings, steering consistently improves the use of prompt-provided information over the unsteered model. These results suggest that the direction captures a transferable preference for external knowledge rather than a mechanism specific to factual conflicts.

Title:Which Knowledge Should LLMs Trust? Uncovering a Generalizable Steering Direction Across Knowledge Conflicts

Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently encounter conflicts between internal parametric knowledge and external contextual knowledge, yet the mechanisms governing this selection remain unclear. We show that the choice between context and parametric knowledge is linearly represented and can be controlled along a single direction in the model's residual stream. We first demonstrate that this direction generalizes across factual-conflict settings, including context formats, knowledge categories, and datasets, while consistently shifting behavior between parametric and contextual answers. We then transfer a direction learned from simple factual conflicts to three more complex task families: RAG, memory, and rule following, where models must acquire information from retrieved documents, interaction histories, or explicit rules. Across four model families and multiple transfer settings, steering consistently improves the use of prompt-provided information over the unsteered model. These results suggest that the direction captures a transferable preference for external knowledge rather than a mechanism specific to factual conflicts.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.20067 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.20067v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20067 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words

Related coverage