aiqbench analysis
This study establishes a quantitative framework for assessing building readiness for agentic AI by measuring the gap between available data/control actions and actual agent performance. The findings indicate that missing or unlinked sensor data, rather than model limitations, are the primary constraints on current AI capabilities in physical environments. This work provides actionable metrics for retrofitting infrastructure to support autonomous building management systems.
Which Buildings Are Artificial Intelligence-Ready? A Measurement-Based Assessment Framework for AI Question Answering and Actuation
arXiv:2610.09119v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems are becoming the interface to buildings, answering questions and controlling operations, but a building's readiness for them has not been systematically assessed. This study proposes a framework to quantify it. First, a building's knowledge graph sets two ceilings. The answerable-readiness ceiling is the share of operational questions its data could answer, and the actuation-readiness ceiling is the share of control actions it exposes. Second, a reference AI agent's accuracy on a fixed set of these questions shows how much of the ceilings is realized. On a simulated office, the agent realizes 0.62 of a 0.64 answerable ceiling, so missing data, not the AI, limit readiness, except in naming a fault's cause. Across 37 public real-building graphs, the median answerable ceiling is 0.16, and in 15 of 45, unlinked sensors lower it. The framework turns "is this building AI-ready?" into an auditable, ranked retrofit question.
Title:Which Buildings Are Artificial Intelligence-Ready? A Measurement-Based Assessment Framework for AI Question Answering and Actuation
Abstract:Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems are becoming the interface to buildings, answering questions and controlling operations, but a building's readiness for them has not been systematically assessed. This study proposes a framework to quantify it. First, a building's knowledge graph sets two ceilings. The answerable-readiness ceiling is the share of operational questions its data could answer, and the actuation-readiness ceiling is the share of control actions it exposes. Second, a reference AI agent's accuracy on a fixed set of these questions shows how much of the ceilings is realized. On a simulated office, the agent realizes 0.62 of a 0.64 answerable ceiling, so missing data, not the AI, limit readiness, except in naming a fault's cause. Across 37 public real-building graphs, the median answerable ceiling is 0.16, and in 15 of 45, unlinked sensors lower it. The framework turns "is this building AI-ready?" into an auditable, ranked retrofit question.
47 pages, 11 figures, 23 tables. Code, results and data supplement: this https URL
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.09119 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.09119v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.09119 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 272 words
Related coverage

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026
Salesforce after Dreamforce: How the CRM giant can grow beyond its own interface
SiliconANGLE · Sep 19, 2026

Inside the suddenly explosive world of AI safety
The Verge · Sep 17, 2026