aiqbench analysis
This research introduces the Waldo benchmark to expose how large language models prioritize query-language sources over conflicting multilingual facts, revealing a critical bias in cross-lingual information synthesis. The study demonstrates that while models can bridge simple knowledge gaps, they strongly align with local-language narratives when factual conflicts arise, potentially skewing global information retrieval. Mitigation strategies involving attention head ablation and LoRA-based training show promise in reducing this preference gap by over 60%.
Where's Waldo? Query-language Preference under Cross-lingual Knowledge Disparities
arXiv:2610.00606v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models increasingly serve as interfaces for knowledge-intensive information seeking tasks across languages by synthesizing multilingual evidence. Prior work has shown that they often exhibit query-language preference -- the tendency to favor sources written in the language of the query -- but has largely examined this behavior in settings where equivalent knowledge is available across languages. However, this bias becomes consequential when sources in different languages provide incomplete or inconsistent accounts of the same fact, since the information users receive then depends on the sources a model selects to use. To characterize query-language preference under such cross-lingual knowledge disparities, we introduce Waldo, a multilingual Question-Answering (QA) benchmark constructed from Wikipedia. Waldo contains 12K QA pairs targeting knowledge gaps, where a fact is available in one language but absent in another, and knowledge conflicts, where language editions provide conflicting versions of the same fact. Evaluating eight models across five languages, we find that when one language edition merely lacks the relevant fact, models generally use evidence from the other language regardless of the query language. Under conflicting accounts, however, model responses strongly align with the document in the query language, causing semantically equivalent queries to elicit different accounts depending on the user's language. Finally, we explore two different approaches that could mitigate this preference under knowledge conflicts: a mechanistic intervention that ablates attention heads associated with query-language preference, and LoRA-based training, which reduces the preference gap by up to 61.5%.
Title:Where's Waldo? Query-language Preference under Cross-lingual Knowledge Disparities
Abstract:Large Language Models increasingly serve as interfaces for knowledge-intensive information seeking tasks across languages by synthesizing multilingual evidence. Prior work has shown that they often exhibit query-language preference -- the tendency to favor sources written in the language of the query -- but has largely examined this behavior in settings where equivalent knowledge is available across languages. However, this bias becomes consequential when sources in different languages provide incomplete or inconsistent accounts of the same fact, since the information users receive then depends on the sources a model selects to use. To characterize query-language preference under such cross-lingual knowledge disparities, we introduce Waldo, a multilingual Question-Answering (QA) benchmark constructed from Wikipedia. Waldo contains 12K QA pairs targeting knowledge gaps, where a fact is available in one language but absent in another, and knowledge conflicts, where language editions provide conflicting versions of the same fact. Evaluating eight models across five languages, we find that when one language edition merely lacks the relevant fact, models generally use evidence from the other language regardless of the query language. Under conflicting accounts, however, model responses strongly align with the document in the query language, causing semantically equivalent queries to elicit different accounts depending on the user's language. Finally, we explore two different approaches that could mitigate this preference under knowledge conflicts: a mechanistic intervention that ablates attention heads associated with query-language preference, and LoRA-based training, which reduces the preference gap by up to 61.5%.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.00606 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.00606v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00606 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 346 words
Related coverage
Inference-Time Steering for Cross-Lingual Factual Consistency in LLMs
arXiv · Jul 23, 2026
actr: aligning thoughts and responses for multilingual safety in reasoning llms
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
Language Chain in Alignment: Cross-Lingual Ranking Preference Optimization
arXiv · Aug 25, 2026
Query-aware routing for Cross-lingual performance gains in Encoders
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026