aiqbench analysis
The paper audits "decision models," small language models that output option probabilities for routing, classification, and triage. Across six models, five give women significantly more favourable yes/no answers than men, and a gender swap flips 1-3.5% of top answers. The authors also find that the vendors' recommended confidence gate reduces some biased decisions but can increase the stereotyped share of the decisions it keeps in ambiguous cases. For practitioners, the takeaway is that off-the-shelf models with no published bias measurements need application-level audits, since probability-level metrics and decision-level outcomes can diverge.
When the Top Answer Decides: Gender Bias in Decision Models
arXiv:2610.39747v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decision models are language models built to route, classify and triage: they return option probabilities from one forward pass, and an application acts on the top answer. They are offered off the shelf, trained for the decision format rather than for fairness or any one application, and we found no bias measurement in their cards. We test TypeSafe's closed Jev and five open decision models on gender-swapped yes/no decisions about people (Tamkin et al., 2023), BBQ, StereoSet and the gender-bias studies of Fulgu and Capraro (2024). Five of the six give women significantly more favourable answers than men (+0.05 to +0.10 in log-odds), and a gender swap changes 1-3.5% of top answers (Jev's partly through its call-to-call variation). The makers' recommended confidence gate removes many biased commitments but raises the stereotyped share of those it keeps in ambiguous BBQ gender questions (granite-switch 0.76 to 0.85, pplx 0.81 to 1.00). Probes show gender preferences in the same models: all six rate violence for a greater good as more acceptable against a man than against a woman, and two default to "girl" when forced to guess a child's gender without a cue. Decision-level and probability-level measures differ, so audits should read a model as its application does.
Abstract:Decision models are language models built to route, classify and triage: they return option probabilities from one forward pass, and an application acts on the top answer. They are offered off the shelf, trained for the decision format rather than for fairness or any one application, and we found no bias measurement in their cards. We test TypeSafe's closed Jev and five open decision models on gender-swapped yes/no decisions about people (Tamkin et al., 2023), BBQ, StereoSet and the gender-bias studies of Fulgu and Capraro (2024). Five of the six give women significantly more favourable answers than men (+0.05 to +0.10 in log-odds), and a gender swap changes 1-3.5% of top answers (Jev's partly through its call-to-call variation). The makers' recommended confidence gate removes many biased commitments but raises the stereotyped share of those it keeps in ambiguous BBQ gender questions (granite-switch 0.76 to 0.85, pplx 0.81 to 1.00). Probes show gender preferences in the same models: all six rate violence for a greater good as more acceptable against a man than against a woman, and two default to "girl" when forced to guess a child's gender without a cue. Decision-level and probability-level measures differ, so audits should read a model as its application does.
19 pages, 6 figures. Code, stimuli and results: this https URL
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
arXiv:2610.39747 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.39747v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.39747 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 313 words
Related coverage

14 Human-in-the-Loop Patterns for AI Agents
Akka Blog · Nov 4, 2026

Introducing ai_decide: make fast decisions on your governed data
Databricks · Sep 30, 2026

14 Human Oversight Patterns for AI Systems
Akka Blog · Nov 1, 2026

Use decision models with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Evaluations
AWS · Nov 4, 2026