aiqbench analysis
This is a theoretical AI paper on abstract argumentation, a knowledge representation framework for reasoning under conflict. It gives sufficient structural conditions, based on paths in the attack graph, under which preferred and stable semantics coincide, generalizing Dung's classic results. Its relevance is mainly to researchers working on formal argumentation and nonmonotonic reasoning, since the conditions are proven rather than empirically tested and have no direct product implications.
When Stable and Preferred Semantics Agree: A Path-Based Approach
arXiv:2610.30176v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We investigate structural conditions under which preferred and stable semantics agree in abstract argumentation frameworks. Our approach is based on suitably chosen sets of paths in the attack graph and binary relations induced by them. We establish a general path-based criterion for semantic agreement and instantiate it with several classes of paths, obtaining sufficient conditions expressed in terms of well-foundedness of the corresponding relations. The resulting conditions strictly generalize two principal structural criteria for preferred and stable agreement in the literature: Dung's limited controversiality condition and the SCC-symmetry condition. In particular, Dung's result is recovered as a special case by taking the relevant path set to be the set of even paths. We further introduce two infinite sequences of path sets, each yielding a family of agreement conditions. For the first sequence, a Collapse Theorem reduces the infinitely many associated well-foundedness conditions to three essentially distinct ones, whereas the second sequence gives rise to genuinely distinct conditions with no analogous collapse. Our results apply to both finite and infinite argumentation frameworks, admit simplified formulations in the finite case, and also yield sufficient conditions for the existence of stable extensions.
Abstract:We investigate structural conditions under which preferred and stable semantics agree in abstract argumentation frameworks. Our approach is based on suitably chosen sets of paths in the attack graph and binary relations induced by them. We establish a general path-based criterion for semantic agreement and instantiate it with several classes of paths, obtaining sufficient conditions expressed in terms of well-foundedness of the corresponding relations. The resulting conditions strictly generalize two principal structural criteria for preferred and stable agreement in the literature: Dung's limited controversiality condition and the SCC-symmetry condition. In particular, Dung's result is recovered as a special case by taking the relevant path set to be the set of even paths. We further introduce two infinite sequences of path sets, each yielding a family of agreement conditions. For the first sequence, a Collapse Theorem reduces the infinitely many associated well-foundedness conditions to three essentially distinct ones, whereas the second sequence gives rise to genuinely distinct conditions with no analogous collapse. Our results apply to both finite and infinite argumentation frameworks, admit simplified formulations in the finite case, and also yield sufficient conditions for the existence of stable extensions.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.30176 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.30176v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.30176 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 281 words
Related coverage
VIBE-Bench: Evaluating Personalized Large Language Models When Profiles Don't Mean Preferences
arXiv · Sep 2, 2026
Complexity of Grounded Semantics and Preferred Semantics in Finitary Argumentation Frameworks
arXiv · Oct 10, 2026
Beyond Semantic Narrowing: Robust and Efficient LLM Watermarking with Hamming Neighborhoods
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
SIDRec: End-to-End Semantic ID Representation and Modeling for Recommendation
arXiv · Nov 4, 2026