Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This research applies AI-driven routing algorithms, specifically an A*-based engine with configurable costs, to prioritize safety and accessibility for older adults over pure distance optimization. By integrating hazard modeling and social context into the pathfinding logic, the study demonstrates how algorithmic design can directly enhance independent mobility and well-being in late-life populations.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

When Shortest Isn't Safest: A Design Science Approach to Senior-Friendly Pedestrian Routing

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2607.24795v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Older adults' independent mobility enables out-of-home participation, well-being and health, yet pedestrian navigation systems still optimize primarily for distance or time, often overlooking barriers, safety thresholds, and supportive infrastructure that shape late-life walking decisions. We present a senior-friendly pedestrian routing artefact developed through echeloned Design Science Re-search, translating lived mobility constraints into prescriptive design knowledge. Based on 11 semi-structured interviews, we derive initial Design Requirements (DRs) and Design Principles (DPs) for barrier-aware, amenity-sensitive routing and execution-relevant explanations. We instantiate these in an OpenStreetMap pedestrian network enriched with amenities (benches, toilets, and shelters) and height data, and implemented an A*-based routing engine with configurable costs and explanation payloads. In a field-based walking study, 14 older adults com-pared artefact-generated routes with baselines and provided ratings and qualitative feedback; the senior-friendly route was preferred overall. Thematic analysis further showed that infrastructure maintenance, seasonal conditions, traffic exposure, and social context shape route acceptance. We synthesize these insights into refined DRs and DPs emphasizing context-aware hazard modeling, multi-route transparency, landmark-grounded explanations, social-context sensitivity, and stage-appropriate information. Our contributions provide actionable guidance for practitioners developing senior-friendly pedestrian navigation systems.

Abstract:Older adults' independent mobility enables out-of-home participation, well-being and health, yet pedestrian navigation systems still optimize primarily for distance or time, often overlooking barriers, safety thresholds, and supportive infrastructure that shape late-life walking decisions. We present a senior-friendly pedestrian routing artefact developed through echeloned Design Science Re-search, translating lived mobility constraints into prescriptive design knowledge. Based on 11 semi-structured interviews, we derive initial Design Requirements (DRs) and Design Principles (DPs) for barrier-aware, amenity-sensitive routing and execution-relevant explanations. We instantiate these in an OpenStreetMap pedestrian network enriched with amenities (benches, toilets, and shelters) and height data, and implemented an A*-based routing engine with configurable costs and explanation payloads. In a field-based walking study, 14 older adults com-pared artefact-generated routes with baselines and provided ratings and qualitative feedback; the senior-friendly route was preferred overall. Thematic analysis further showed that infrastructure maintenance, seasonal conditions, traffic exposure, and social context shape route acceptance. We synthesize these insights into refined DRs and DPs emphasizing context-aware hazard modeling, multi-route transparency, landmark-grounded explanations, social-context sensitivity, and stage-appropriate information. Our contributions provide actionable guidance for practitioners developing senior-friendly pedestrian navigation systems.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

arXiv:2607.24795 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.24795v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.24795 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Design for Better Futures: Beyond the Science of the Artificial. Completed Research, LNCS 16605 (2026) 406-424

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-28316-0_23 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 304 words

Related coverage