Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses the critical issue of hallucinations in Generative AI by introducing a method that uses Rhetorical Structure Theory to improve the faithfulness of generated diagrams to their source text. The study demonstrates that model reasoning capabilities significantly impact performance on out-of-distribution tasks, offering a more robust approach for educational applications where visual accuracy is paramount.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

When Looks Do Not Lie: Discourse Structure Guided In-Context Learning for Faithful Diagram Generation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2601.20476v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: GenAI is widespread in educational applications; however, it is known to generate content with intrinsic and extrinsic hallucination. We introduce a novel method for ICL diagram generation based on Rhetorical Structure Theory, which improves diagram faithfulness to its source text context. We find that ICL performance depends on task distribution and models' reasoning ability, with higher reasoning allowing better quality and performance for an out-of-distribution task. We perform an expert evaluation of 150 generated diagrams and analyze our findings using Bayesian GLMMs. Additionally, we use our evaluation rubric and samples from the data set for automated diagram evaluation, achieving statistically significant agreement with human evaluation.

Abstract:GenAI is widespread in educational applications; however, it is known to generate content with intrinsic and extrinsic hallucination. We introduce a novel method for ICL diagram generation based on Rhetorical Structure Theory, which improves diagram faithfulness to its source text context. We find that ICL performance depends on task distribution and models' reasoning ability, with higher reasoning allowing better quality and performance for an out-of-distribution task. We perform an expert evaluation of 150 generated diagrams and analyze our findings using Bayesian GLMMs. Additionally, we use our evaluation rubric and samples from the data set for automated diagram evaluation, achieving statistically significant agreement with human evaluation.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2601.20476 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2601.20476v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.20476 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 198 words

Related coverage