Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research exposes a critical privacy vulnerability in domain-adapted SpeechLLMs, where models can inadvertently transcribe phonetically similar words from sensitive context or training data even when different speech is provided. The study demonstrates that both prompting and fine-tuning mechanisms contribute to this leakage, with risks compounding when combined, necessitating a careful trade-off between model accuracy and information security. For professionals deploying customised ASR systems, the findings suggest that fine-tuning without relying on context prompts currently offers the most balanced approach to mitigating these risks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

When Helpful Context Leaks: Privacy Risks in Domain-Adapted ASR

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.28211v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: SpeechLLMs are increasingly deployed in professional settings where domain customisation is standard practice: users supply context in prompts with sensitive information, fine-tune on proprietary recordings, or both. We identify and systematically investigate an overlooked privacy risk of such customisation: a model adapted to recognise domain-specific terminology can be nudged into transcribing a phonetically similar word from its context or training data, even when a different word is spoken, thereby leaking private information. To evaluate this risk, we propose a technique to automatically construct benchmarks of such attacks and apply it to measure leakage rates across two customisation mechanisms, prompting and fine-tuning. Both mechanisms cause measurable leakage, compounding when combined. We evaluate a prompt-level mitigation strategy and analyse the accuracy-leakage trade-off across customisation approaches, finding that fine-tuning without context prompts offers the best balance.

Abstract:SpeechLLMs are increasingly deployed in professional settings where domain customisation is standard practice: users supply context in prompts with sensitive information, fine-tune on proprietary recordings, or both. We identify and systematically investigate an overlooked privacy risk of such customisation: a model adapted to recognise domain-specific terminology can be nudged into transcribing a phonetically similar word from its context or training data, even when a different word is spoken, thereby leaking private information. To evaluate this risk, we propose a technique to automatically construct benchmarks of such attacks and apply it to measure leakage rates across two customisation mechanisms, prompting and fine-tuning. Both mechanisms cause measurable leakage, compounding when combined. We evaluate a prompt-level mitigation strategy and analyse the accuracy-leakage trade-off across customisation approaches, finding that fine-tuning without context prompts offers the best balance.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2605.28211 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.28211v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.28211 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 226 words

Related coverage