Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research demonstrates that minimizing mean Age of Information (AoI) is insufficient for optimizing networked control systems, as performance critically depends on higher-order statistical moments of update intervals. For unstable or correlated regimes, the full distribution of inter-scheduling times, rather than just the average freshness, dictates tracking costs in linear time-invariant systems. These findings provide a necessary theoretical correction for engineers designing wireless update systems where closed-loop stability and accuracy are paramount.
Source coveringarXiv

When Freshness Is Not Enough: Distribution-Aware Age of Information for Networked LQR Control

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2606.04361v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Age of Information (AoI) has become a central metric for the design of wireless update systems, especially in applications where fresh measurements support tracking, estimation, and control. Despite its popularity, the use of mean AoI or peak AoI as a surrogate for closed-loop performance is often motivated by intuition rather than by a control-theoretic derivation. This paper examines whether minimizing the mean AoI is in fact optimal for networked control systems. For scalar linear time-invariant systems with delayed intermittent updates, we show that, under state-independent scheduling policies, the infinite-horizon LQR tracking problem reduces to an optimization over the distribution of inter-scheduling intervals. The resulting objective depends on higher-order statistical moments, and in unstable or correlated regimes on exponential moments, of the inter-scheduling process rather than only on its mean. Consequently, policies with identical mean AoI can induce substantially different tracking costs. We further extend the analysis to disturbances with exponentially decaying autocorrelation and derive equivalent cost formulations that expose the role of the full interval distribution. Finally, we validate the theory using real vehicle trajectories from the NGSIM US-101 dataset. The empirical results match the predicted performance trends, demonstrating that mean AoI alone is insufficient for control-oriented network design.

Abstract:Age of Information (AoI) has become a central metric for the design of wireless update systems, especially in applications where fresh measurements support tracking, estimation, and control. Despite its popularity, the use of mean AoI or peak AoI as a surrogate for closed-loop performance is often motivated by intuition rather than by a control-theoretic derivation. This paper examines whether minimizing the mean AoI is in fact optimal for networked control systems. For scalar linear time-invariant systems with delayed intermittent updates, we show that, under state-independent scheduling policies, the infinite-horizon LQR tracking problem reduces to an optimization over the distribution of inter-scheduling intervals. The resulting objective depends on higher-order statistical moments, and in unstable or correlated regimes on exponential moments, of the inter-scheduling process rather than only on its mean. Consequently, policies with identical mean AoI can induce substantially different tracking costs. We further extend the analysis to disturbances with exponentially decaying autocorrelation and derive equivalent cost formulations that expose the role of the full interval distribution. Finally, we validate the theory using real vehicle trajectories from the NGSIM US-101 dataset. The empirical results match the predicted performance trends, demonstrating that mean AoI alone is insufficient for control-oriented network design.

Systems and Control (eess.SY); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Robotics (cs.RO); Dynamical Systems (math.DS); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2606.04361 [eess.SY]

(or arXiv:2606.04361v1 [eess.SY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04361 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 306 words