aiqbench analysis
Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.
When Does Sparse Routing Help? The Geometry of Expert Separation in Mixture of Experts
arXiv:2611.01602v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse mixtures of experts combine multiple prediction models while evaluating only a small subset for each input. Although this architecture reduces computation, how expert separation and routing sparsity jointly govern expert recovery remains an open problem. In this paper, we address this question for location Gaussian mixtures of experts with a fixed number of experts by establishing how expert separation and spatial arrangement determine recovery rates. For dense models, our results reveal that when experts form well-separated clusters, the separation geometry is governed by the size of the largest cluster; without a prescribed cluster structure, this geometry is instead driven by the total number of experts. For sparse models, the separation geometry on retained routing regions is determined by the number of active experts, while the contribution of omitted regions is controlled by their total probability. Consequently, activating fewer experts reduces the separation complexity in these bounds. Furthermore, Top-1 routing yields a particularly striking result: experts can be recovered at a rate independent of the separation quantity. Our technical approach combines polynomial interpolation and Gaussian reproducing-kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) test functions with quantitative restriction inequalities that extend pointwise comparisons to expert functions.
Title:When Does Sparse Routing Help? The Geometry of Expert Separation in Mixture of Experts
Abstract:Sparse mixtures of experts combine multiple prediction models while evaluating only a small subset for each input. Although this architecture reduces computation, how expert separation and routing sparsity jointly govern expert recovery remains an open problem. In this paper, we address this question for location Gaussian mixtures of experts with a fixed number of experts by establishing how expert separation and spatial arrangement determine recovery rates. For dense models, our results reveal that when experts form well-separated clusters, the separation geometry is governed by the size of the largest cluster; without a prescribed cluster structure, this geometry is instead driven by the total number of experts. For sparse models, the separation geometry on retained routing regions is determined by the number of active experts, while the contribution of omitted regions is controlled by their total probability. Consequently, activating fewer experts reduces the separation complexity in these bounds. Furthermore, Top-1 routing yields a particularly striking result: experts can be recovered at a rate independent of the separation quantity. Our technical approach combines polynomial interpolation and Gaussian reproducing-kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) test functions with quantitative restriction inequalities that extend pointwise comparisons to expert functions.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2611.01602 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2611.01602v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.01602 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 303 words
Related coverage
GeoLatent: Geometry-Guided Latent Structuring with Routed Optimization for 3D Reasoning
arXiv · Oct 2, 2026
Block-Norm Geometries for Online Mirror Descent with Sparse Losses
arXiv · Sep 14, 2026
Recovering Weighted Tangent Geometry from a Single-Scale Score Field
arXiv · Aug 25, 2026
SceneAE: Scene Generation and Reconstruction in Queryable 3D-Anchored Latent Space
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026