Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes a robust betting strategy for prediction markets based on central limit order books, enabling AI models to reliably convert forecasting accuracy into profit even with real-world market frictions like fees and discrete fills. By empirically testing thousands of AI-generated forecasts on platforms like Kalshi, the study identifies specific personas and strategies that maximize returns under these modern exchange designs.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

When do prophets profit in prediction markets?

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2607.06166v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Prediction markets aggregate dispersed beliefs into prices that act as probabilistic forecasts of uncertain events. Classical theory establishes how a better-than-market forecast can yield positive trading profit. However, it hinges crucially on the specific automated market maker (AMM) design, and is not applicable to popular exchanges today which are based on central limit order books. This paper fills that gap. For any prediction market and any proper scoring rule $S$, we exhibit a ``proper'' betting strategy that depends only on the forecaster's prediction $\mathbf{p}$ and the market price $\mathbf{q}$, and earns positive expected profit \emph{whenever} $\mathbf{p}$ outperforms $\mathbf{q}$ under $S$ and the market has sufficient liquidity. Moreover, this proper betting is essentially the only strategy with such robust profitability guarantee. Our proof rests on a decomposition of expected profit that strictly generalizes the classical AMM guarantee and also explains how strategies can profit even without an accuracy edge. Empirically, across thousands of forecasts by AI models, proper betting is the only strategy that reliably converts accuracy into profit, and we further identify systematic forecasting personas and show how the optimal proper strategy varies across them. For feasibility demonstration, we run a monthlong live pilot test on Kalshi; the encouraging preliminary results show that proper betting can survive real-world spreads, fees, discrete fills, and limited liquidity.

Title:When do prophets profit in prediction markets?

Abstract:Prediction markets aggregate dispersed beliefs into prices that act as probabilistic forecasts of uncertain events. Classical theory establishes how a better-than-market forecast can yield positive trading profit. However, it hinges crucially on the specific automated market maker (AMM) design, and is not applicable to popular exchanges today which are based on central limit order books. This paper fills that gap. For any prediction market and any proper scoring rule $S$, we exhibit a ``proper'' betting strategy that depends only on the forecaster's prediction $\mathbf{p}$ and the market price $\mathbf{q}$, and earns positive expected profit \emph{whenever} $\mathbf{p}$ outperforms $\mathbf{q}$ under $S$ and the market has sufficient liquidity. Moreover, this proper betting is essentially the only strategy with such robust profitability guarantee. Our proof rests on a decomposition of expected profit that strictly generalizes the classical AMM guarantee and also explains how strategies can profit even without an accuracy edge. Empirically, across thousands of forecasts by AI models, proper betting is the only strategy that reliably converts accuracy into profit, and we further identify systematic forecasting personas and show how the optimal proper strategy varies across them. For feasibility demonstration, we run a monthlong live pilot test on Kalshi; the encouraging preliminary results show that proper betting can survive real-world spreads, fees, discrete fills, and limited liquidity.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)

arXiv:2607.06166 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.06166v3 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.06166 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 326 words

Related coverage