Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper is theoretical machine learning work on active learning for halfspaces. It asks when a learner that can only label sampled points, rather than arbitrary ones, can match the label efficiency of membership queries. The results give label bounds under specific angular and marginal conditions, plus a lower bound showing that the cost shifts to unlabeled data. Readers should treat these as precise, assumption-bound complexity results, not practical guidance for production systems.
Source coveringarXiv

When Can Unlabeled Data Pools Replace Membership Queries?

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2610.41001v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Membership queries let a learner label arbitrary points and give near-optimal $\tilde O(n\log(1/\eps))$ label complexity for halfspaces under every marginal. A pool learner may label only sampled points. We ask when unlabeled data can replace membership queries. For homogeneous halfspaces the answer depends only on the angular law of $X/\|X\|$. If this law assigns zero mass to every hyperplane through the origin and positive mass to every nonempty open set of directions together with its reflection, a pool learner uses $O(n\log^3n\log(n/(\eps\delta)))$ labels, uniformly over all such marginals and targets, without density, moment, concavity or isotropy assumptions. The same label bound holds for non-homogeneous halfspaces under every marginal with full support and no mass on affine hyperplanes, including Gaussians. Dropping either angular assumption admits $\Omega(1/\eps)$ pool versus $O(\log(1/\eps))$ membership-query separations, even with unlimited unlabeled data. The price is paid in unlabeled data: in dimension $n\ge3$, for every unlabeled budget fixed in advance, some marginal satisfying both assumptions forces $\Omega(1/\eps)$ labels. For isotropic $s$-concave marginals in dimension $n\ge3$, unlimited pools keep logarithmic label rates for every finite $s$. With an unlabeled budget fixed in advance, class-uniform polylogarithmic rates hold exactly for $s>-1/(n+1)$, or $s>-1/n$ under central symmetry, and in the general class the optimal rate between these thresholds is $\tilde\Theta(\eps^{-(n-2)/n})$. This extends the range $s\ge-1/(2n+3)$ of previous sample-based guarantees, in the realizable setting.

Title:When Can Unlabeled Data Pools Replace Membership Queries?

Abstract:Membership queries let a learner label arbitrary points and give near-optimal $\tilde O(n\log(1/\eps))$ label complexity for halfspaces under every marginal. A pool learner may label only sampled points. We ask when unlabeled data can replace membership queries. For homogeneous halfspaces the answer depends only on the angular law of $X/\|X\|$. If this law assigns zero mass to every hyperplane through the origin and positive mass to every nonempty open set of directions together with its reflection, a pool learner uses $O(n\log^3n\log(n/(\eps\delta)))$ labels, uniformly over all such marginals and targets, without density, moment, concavity or isotropy assumptions. The same label bound holds for non-homogeneous halfspaces under every marginal with full support and no mass on affine hyperplanes, including Gaussians. Dropping either angular assumption admits $\Omega(1/\eps)$ pool versus $O(\log(1/\eps))$ membership-query separations, even with unlimited unlabeled data. The price is paid in unlabeled data: in dimension $n\ge3$, for every unlabeled budget fixed in advance, some marginal satisfying both assumptions forces $\Omega(1/\eps)$ labels. For isotropic $s$-concave marginals in dimension $n\ge3$, unlimited pools keep logarithmic label rates for every finite $s$. With an unlabeled budget fixed in advance, class-uniform polylogarithmic rates hold exactly for $s>-1/(n+1)$, or $s>-1/n$ under central symmetry, and in the general class the optimal rate between these thresholds is $\tilde\Theta(\eps^{-(n-2)/n})$. This extends the range $s\ge-1/(2n+3)$ of previous sample-based guarantees, in the realizable setting.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.41001 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.41001v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.41001 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 323 words

Related coverage