Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This paper addresses a critical flaw in current visual token pruning methods where reliance on single attention scores causes feature redundancy and loss of contextual detail. The proposed Structure-to-Semantics framework decouples the pruning process into two stages: first maximizing spatial diversity through repulsion-based sampling, then refining tokens via instruction-aware cross-attention. This approach effectively mitigates attention collapse, offering improved structural coverage and fine-grained task alignment for Vision-Language Models.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

When Attention Collapses: Stage-Aware Visual Token Pruning from Structure to Semantics

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2606.03569v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities but suffer from significant computational overhead during inference. While visual token pruning offers a promising solution, existing methods predominantly rely on initial attention scores. This single-metric paradigm presents a critical flaw: high attention scores inherently collapse onto semantically similar regions, thereby severely reducing feature diversity and discarding vital contextual details. To address this, we introduce Structure-to-Semantics (STS), a novel two-stage visual token pruning framework that explicitly decouples the pruning process. The first stage employs a repulsion-based sampling mechanism to maximize spatial and structural diversity. The second stage leverages instruction-aware cross-attention to precisely filter out prompt-irrelevant tokens. This two-stage synergy constitutes the core of STS, first ensuring geometric coverage and then refining the retained tokens according to semantic relevance. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that STS mitigates the redundancy caused by attention-based selection, improving both structural diversity and fine-grained task alignment of the preserved visual tokens.

Abstract:Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities but suffer from significant computational overhead during inference. While visual token pruning offers a promising solution, existing methods predominantly rely on initial attention scores. This single-metric paradigm presents a critical flaw: high attention scores inherently collapse onto semantically similar regions, thereby severely reducing feature diversity and discarding vital contextual details. To address this, we introduce Structure-to-Semantics (STS), a novel two-stage visual token pruning framework that explicitly decouples the pruning process. The first stage employs a repulsion-based sampling mechanism to maximize spatial and structural diversity. The second stage leverages instruction-aware cross-attention to precisely filter out prompt-irrelevant tokens. This two-stage synergy constitutes the core of STS, first ensuring geometric coverage and then refining the retained tokens according to semantic relevance. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that STS mitigates the redundancy caused by attention-based selection, improving both structural diversity and fine-grained task alignment of the preserved visual tokens.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2606.03569 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2606.03569v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.03569 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 250 words

Related coverage