aiqbench analysis
This study leverages large-scale app store review analysis to quantify user trust and friction points across six major generative AI applications, offering actionable insights into adoption barriers like pricing and reliability. By combining advanced NLP techniques with statistical validation, the research provides a robust framework for understanding how sentiment polarization varies between models such as Claude and DeepSeek. These findings are critical for developers and policymakers aiming to improve consumer confidence in next-generation AI tools.
What Users Think of Generative AI: A Cross-Platform NLP Analysis of Trust and Friction in App Store Reviews
arXiv:2609.19151v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative AI (GenAI) applications have achieved rapid consumer adoption, yet little large-scale research examines user-perceived quality, trust, and adoption barriers. We present one of the first cross-application analyses of app store reviews for six major GenAI applications (ChatGPT, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, DeepSeek, and Perplexity), comprising 17,012 English-language reviews from Google Play and the Apple App Store. We combine BERTopic topic modeling with RoBERTa sentiment classification and evaluate cross-application differences using chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and multinomial logistic regression with Bonferroni correction. Both components are validated against human coding using a stratified sample of 300 reviews. Results show that negative sentiment concentrates in advertising (91%), authentication (89%), server reliability (83%), and subscription pricing (73%). Sentiment differs significantly across applications, with Claude exhibiting the highest negative sentiment (47.7%) alongside a strongly enthusiastic user base, indicating statistically significant polarization. These findings are robust despite unequal review counts across applications. As exploratory observations, a subset of DeepSeek reviews raised geopolitical and data privacy concerns related to its Chinese origin, while a proposed Trust Friction Score summarizes application-specific trust and usability barriers into interpretable dimensions. The study provides validated and actionable evidence on user trust, usability, and adoption barriers in consumer generative AI applications.
Abstract:Generative AI (GenAI) applications have achieved rapid consumer adoption, yet little large-scale research examines user-perceived quality, trust, and adoption barriers. We present one of the first cross-application analyses of app store reviews for six major GenAI applications (ChatGPT, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, DeepSeek, and Perplexity), comprising 17,012 English-language reviews from Google Play and the Apple App Store. We combine BERTopic topic modeling with RoBERTa sentiment classification and evaluate cross-application differences using chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and multinomial logistic regression with Bonferroni correction. Both components are validated against human coding using a stratified sample of 300 reviews. Results show that negative sentiment concentrates in advertising (91%), authentication (89%), server reliability (83%), and subscription pricing (73%). Sentiment differs significantly across applications, with Claude exhibiting the highest negative sentiment (47.7%) alongside a strongly enthusiastic user base, indicating statistically significant polarization. These findings are robust despite unequal review counts across applications. As exploratory observations, a subset of DeepSeek reviews raised geopolitical and data privacy concerns related to its Chinese origin, while a proposed Trust Friction Score summarizes application-specific trust and usability barriers into interpretable dimensions. The study provides validated and actionable evidence on user trust, usability, and adoption barriers in consumer generative AI applications.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
arXiv:2609.19151 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.19151v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19151 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 297 words
Related coverage

Presentation: Building Evals for AI Adoption: from Principles to Practice
InfoQ · May 29, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026