Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates the robustness of Large Language Model adaptation strategies when applied to climate disclosure classification across different document sources. The study reveals that while fine-tuning methods perform best within a single source, they often degrade under distribution shifts, whereas simpler approaches like few-shot prompting and precise definitions offer more reliable cross-source generalization. For practitioners deploying AI in regulated domains, this suggests prioritizing lightweight adaptation techniques over heavy parameter tuning when facing diverse data inputs.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

What Transfers Under Source Shift? Definitions, Examples, and Fine-Tuning for Climate Disclosure Classification

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2607.17952v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Climate disclosure classification is a fundamental task for analysing corporate climate disclosures, yet such disclosures appear in many different sources -- annual reports, press releases, and earnings calls -- that differ in length, purpose, and writing style. Existing evaluations are mostly conducted within a single source, leaving open whether common LLM adaptation strategies remain effective under source shift. We reframe climate disclosure classification as a cross-source adaptation problem and study three widely used adaptation strategies -- definitions, examples, and fine-tuning -- across eleven open- and closed-source LLMs, using two corpora that share the same label space but come from different sources. We find that all strategies bring positive cross-source gains on average, but the strongest in-source strategies are not the strongest cross-source ones: similarity-based retrieval and LoRA fine-tuning gain most in-source but lose most of that advantage under source shift; randomly selected few-shot examples, a weaker in-source baseline, retain their advantage more reliably; definitions transfer most consistently, though only when their granularity matches the target text. Across these strategies, when the source changes, simpler is often safer.

Title:What Transfers Under Source Shift? Definitions, Examples, and Fine-Tuning for Climate Disclosure Classification

Abstract:Climate disclosure classification is a fundamental task for analysing corporate climate disclosures, yet such disclosures appear in many different sources -- annual reports, press releases, and earnings calls -- that differ in length, purpose, and writing style. Existing evaluations are mostly conducted within a single source, leaving open whether common LLM adaptation strategies remain effective under source shift. We reframe climate disclosure classification as a cross-source adaptation problem and study three widely used adaptation strategies -- definitions, examples, and fine-tuning -- across eleven open- and closed-source LLMs, using two corpora that share the same label space but come from different sources. We find that all strategies bring positive cross-source gains on average, but the strongest in-source strategies are not the strongest cross-source ones: similarity-based retrieval and LoRA fine-tuning gain most in-source but lose most of that advantage under source shift; randomly selected few-shot examples, a weaker in-source baseline, retain their advantage more reliably; definitions transfer most consistently, though only when their granularity matches the target text. Across these strategies, when the source changes, simpler is often safer.

15 pages, 12 figures. Code: this https URL

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE)

arXiv:2607.17952 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2607.17952v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.17952 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 299 words

Related coverage