aiqbench analysis
This paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the data-driven newsvendor problem under demand censoring, offering exact finite-dimensional characterizations that improve worst-case regret by up to 40%. By demonstrating how targeted exploration at high inventory levels can overcome limitations in passive sales data, it advances the frontier of offline reinforcement learning and causal inference techniques.
What is the Value of Censored Data? An Exact Analysis for the Data-driven Newsvendor
arXiv:2602.16842v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study the offline data-driven newsvendor problem when historical demand is censored by past inventory levels. We introduce a class of policies for which worst-case expected regret over all bounded demand distributions admits an exact finite-dimensional characterization, valid for any sample size and historical inventory design. The dimension depends on the number of distinct inventory levels, rather than the number of observations. This framework yields exact analyses of the sales-as-demand heuristic, the Kaplan-Meier policy, and recent policies from the censored-newsvendor literature. We leverage this reduction to derive sharp insights on the achievable performance of standard inventory policies under demand censoring. In particular, our analysis of the Kaplan-Meier policy shows that while demand censoring fundamentally limits what can be learned from passive sales data, just a small amount of targeted exploration at high inventory levels can substantially improve worst-case guarantees. Finally, we further leverage our reduction to design new policies that push the frontier and substantially improve upon the worst-case regret of known policies, reducing it by up to 40%.
Title:What is the Value of Censored Data? An Exact Analysis for the Data-driven Newsvendor
Abstract:We study the offline data-driven newsvendor problem when historical demand is censored by past inventory levels. We introduce a class of policies for which worst-case expected regret over all bounded demand distributions admits an exact finite-dimensional characterization, valid for any sample size and historical inventory design. The dimension depends on the number of distinct inventory levels, rather than the number of observations. This framework yields exact analyses of the sales-as-demand heuristic, the Kaplan-Meier policy, and recent policies from the censored-newsvendor literature. We leverage this reduction to derive sharp insights on the achievable performance of standard inventory policies under demand censoring. In particular, our analysis of the Kaplan-Meier policy shows that while demand censoring fundamentally limits what can be learned from passive sales data, just a small amount of targeted exploration at high inventory levels can substantially improve worst-case guarantees. Finally, we further leverage our reduction to design new policies that push the frontier and substantially improve upon the worst-case regret of known policies, reducing it by up to 40%.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2602.16842 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2602.16842v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.16842 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 275 words
Related coverage
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 11, 2026

Does distilling Claude carry the persona with it?
LessWrong · Jul 24, 2026
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · Jul 16, 2026

Hands-free first notice of loss: Using Strands Agents and Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Browser Tool for intelligent claims intake
AWS · Jun 9, 2026