Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research advances robot learning by using high-frequency tactile reflex controllers as teachers to shape demonstrations for fragile object manipulation, effectively bypassing the latency issues of manual data collection. The study demonstrates that this approach enables policies trained without direct tactile integration to achieve 95% stability on nominal tasks while highlighting the specific limits of disturbance rejection when relying solely on learned policies.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

What is the Better Curriculum: Controller-Shaped Grasping Behavior for Contact Force-Sensitive Manipulation

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.25887v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How should a robot learn to manipulate objects so fragile that sub-Newton contact forces can cause irreversible damage? Existing visuo-tactile policy learning typically treats tactile sensing as an additional policy input. In direct-contact force-sensitive manipulation, however, the bottleneck can arise earlier, during data collection: manual gripper control is too delayed and coarse-grained to reliably maintain the narrow force range required for stable grasping. We therefore use a deterministic 25 Hz tactile reflex controller as a collection-time teacher, producing demonstrations with controller-shaped grasping behavior for tactile-free policy learning. On Action Chunking with Transformers (ACT), policies trained from reflex-shaped demonstrations recover the teacher's grasping profile and achieve 95% stable grasps on the nominal plastic-cup task, substantially outperforming visually screened manual demonstrations. The same intervention improves in-distribution stability on $\pi_{0.5}$ and shows a favorable exploratory trend on an unseen paper-cup variant. Under randomized external disturbance, however, the reflex-data $\pi_{0.5}$ policy still fails in 45% of policy-only trials, whereas a deployment-time reflex arbiter retains all grasps. These results reveal a new role for tactile feedback in force-sensitive manipulation: rather than integrating tactile into the policy, we use it as a collection-time teacher that shapes grasping behavior in demonstrations for policy learning, while disturbance rejection remains controller-dependent, revealing the boundary of tactile-free policy.

Abstract:How should a robot learn to manipulate objects so fragile that sub-Newton contact forces can cause irreversible damage? Existing visuo-tactile policy learning typically treats tactile sensing as an additional policy input. In direct-contact force-sensitive manipulation, however, the bottleneck can arise earlier, during data collection: manual gripper control is too delayed and coarse-grained to reliably maintain the narrow force range required for stable grasping. We therefore use a deterministic 25 Hz tactile reflex controller as a collection-time teacher, producing demonstrations with controller-shaped grasping behavior for tactile-free policy learning. On Action Chunking with Transformers (ACT), policies trained from reflex-shaped demonstrations recover the teacher's grasping profile and achieve 95% stable grasps on the nominal plastic-cup task, substantially outperforming visually screened manual demonstrations. The same intervention improves in-distribution stability on $\pi_{0.5}$ and shows a favorable exploratory trend on an unseen paper-cup variant. Under randomized external disturbance, however, the reflex-data $\pi_{0.5}$ policy still fails in 45% of policy-only trials, whereas a deployment-time reflex arbiter retains all grasps. These results reveal a new role for tactile feedback in force-sensitive manipulation: rather than integrating tactile into the policy, we use it as a collection-time teacher that shapes grasping behavior in demonstrations for policy learning, while disturbance rejection remains controller-dependent, revealing the boundary of tactile-free policy.

22 pages, 6 figures. Project page: this https URL

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.25887 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.25887v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25887 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 310 words

Related coverage