aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates that making a robot's inferred goals legible through visual feedback significantly improves coordination and reduces user intervention in shared autonomy systems. Crucially, trust is driven by task-appropriate information exposure rather than maximal disclosure, as revealing full belief distributions did not consistently enhance alignment. These findings provide actionable guidelines for designing assistive robots that balance user control with autonomous assistance without overwhelming the operator.
What Is My Robot Thinking? Design Considerations for Transparent and Trustworthy Shared Autonomy
arXiv:2606.06870v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Assistive robots operating under shared autonomy must balance user control with autonomous assistance. Because robot actions depend on internal intent inference that is not directly observable, mismatches between inferred and intended goals can undermine coordination and trust. We investigate how interface-level transparency, including feedback modality (visual vs. auditory) and information richness (sparse vs. rich), shapes interaction in a vision-based shared autonomy system. In a user study with N=25 participants across two assistive manipulation tasks, we evaluate how these designs influence coordination and trust. Providing feedback significantly improves intent alignment and reduces corrective intervention, indicating that making the inferred goal legible accelerates convergence in shared control. Participants preferred visual over auditory feedback, while preferences for sparse versus rich information depended on task complexity. We also found that revealing the full belief distribution did not consistently improve alignment or trust. Together, these findings indicate that effective transparency enhances coordination primarily through goal legibility, while trust depends on task-appropriate information exposure rather than maximal disclosure. Based on these results, we outline guidelines for designing transparent shared autonomy systems.
Title:What Is My Robot Thinking? Design Considerations for Transparent and Trustworthy Shared Autonomy
Abstract:Assistive robots operating under shared autonomy must balance user control with autonomous assistance. Because robot actions depend on internal intent inference that is not directly observable, mismatches between inferred and intended goals can undermine coordination and trust. We investigate how interface-level transparency, including feedback modality (visual vs. auditory) and information richness (sparse vs. rich), shapes interaction in a vision-based shared autonomy system. In a user study with N=25 participants across two assistive manipulation tasks, we evaluate how these designs influence coordination and trust. Providing feedback significantly improves intent alignment and reduces corrective intervention, indicating that making the inferred goal legible accelerates convergence in shared control. Participants preferred visual over auditory feedback, while preferences for sparse versus rich information depended on task complexity. We also found that revealing the full belief distribution did not consistently improve alignment or trust. Together, these findings indicate that effective transparency enhances coordination primarily through goal legibility, while trust depends on task-appropriate information exposure rather than maximal disclosure. Based on these results, we outline guidelines for designing transparent shared autonomy systems.
9 pages, 5 Figures, Code and videos are available at this https URL. Under review at IROS 2026
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2606.06870 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2606.06870v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06870 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 299 words
Related coverage

Adobe’s ‘natural look’ camera app embraces generative AI
The Verge · Jul 20, 2026

MIT builds a way to mass-produce flexible photonic chips
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 3, 2026

Riemann Manifold Diffusion Simplifies Path Integral Construction
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 21, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026