Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This survey of 229 students applies the Technology Acceptance Model to conversational AI and finds that perceived usefulness and enjoyment predict intention to use these tools for learning, while ease of use and trust do not directly predict it. The study is a single-sample, self-reported survey, so its results describe associations rather than causes. For readers building or deploying AI tools in education, it suggests that demonstrated value and engagement may matter more than usability or trust messaging alone.
Sources coveringarXiv, Wired, NVIDIA, SiliconANGLE

What Drives Students' Use of AI Chatbots? Technology Acceptance in Conversational AI

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2602.20547v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Conversational AI tools have been rapidly adopted by students and are becoming part of their learning routines. This widespread use comes amid ongoing concerns about the reliability of AI-generated responses and the appropriate role of AI in education. Drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model, we examine how students' perceptions of conversational AI, including its usefulness, ease of use, trustworthiness, enjoyment, and social influence, relate to their intentions to use these tools for learning. We investigate both the direct and indirect relationships among these perceptions to understand how they are associated with students' behavioral intentions. Using survey data from 229 students and partial least squares structural equation modeling, we found that perceived usefulness was the strongest direct predictor of intention, followed by perceived enjoyment. Perceived ease of use, trust, and subjective norms did not have significant direct associations with intention. However, trust and subjective norms had significant total indirect associations, while perceived enjoyment had both significant direct and indirect associations. The model explained 70.2% of the variance in behavioral intention. These findings suggest that students' intentions to use conversational AI are associated less directly with effort-related considerations and more with perceived usefulness and affective experience. They also highlight the importance of understanding what students perceive as valuable in conversational AI interactions, particularly when designing tools intended to encourage engagement while supporting learning.

Title:What Drives Students' Use of AI Chatbots? Technology Acceptance in Conversational AI

Abstract:Conversational AI tools have been rapidly adopted by students and are becoming part of their learning routines. This widespread use comes amid ongoing concerns about the reliability of AI-generated responses and the appropriate role of AI in education. Drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model, we examine how students' perceptions of conversational AI, including its usefulness, ease of use, trustworthiness, enjoyment, and social influence, relate to their intentions to use these tools for learning. We investigate both the direct and indirect relationships among these perceptions to understand how they are associated with students' behavioral intentions. Using survey data from 229 students and partial least squares structural equation modeling, we found that perceived usefulness was the strongest direct predictor of intention, followed by perceived enjoyment. Perceived ease of use, trust, and subjective norms did not have significant direct associations with intention. However, trust and subjective norms had significant total indirect associations, while perceived enjoyment had both significant direct and indirect associations. The model explained 70.2% of the variance in behavioral intention. These findings suggest that students' intentions to use conversational AI are associated less directly with effort-related considerations and more with perceived usefulness and affective experience. They also highlight the importance of understanding what students perceive as valuable in conversational AI interactions, particularly when designing tools intended to encourage engagement while supporting learning.

Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET)

arXiv:2602.20547 [cs.HC]

(or arXiv:2602.20547v2 [cs.HC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.20547 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 335 words

Related coverage