aiqbench analysis
This research investigates the specific textual properties that drive Chain-of-Thought prompting benefits by analyzing model behavior at probe time. The study demonstrates that global reasoning order is less critical than local word co-occurrences, with significant performance gains emerging from short-range windows of just three words. These findings provide a mechanistic explanation for how LLMs utilize rationales without relying on the sequential narrative structure traditionally assumed in CoT methods.
What Does Chain-of-Thought Contribute at Probe Time? Evidence for Local Co-Occurrence Activation
arXiv:2605.26795v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting enhances large language model performance, yet what drives these gains remains unclear. We study this question from a probe-time perspective: holding CoT rationales fixed, we test which textual properties matter for the final prediction. Across multiple datasets and model configurations, we find that randomizing the order of rationale sentences has little effect on accuracy, suggesting that the global order of reasoning steps is not the main source of the probe-time benefit. Moreover, even when the words in a rationale are randomly reordered, performance remains well above the no-rationale baseline, indicating that the rationale's words remain useful even without their original order. Restoring only short-range word order further improves performance and brings it substantially closer to full CoT. In most settings, much of this local-order gain is already obtained with three-word windows. Control experiments rule out explicit answer copying, simple lexical cues, generic topical context, and general robustness to shuffling as the main explanations. Mechanistic analyses further show that short-window gains are largely formed in early-to-middle model layers, with answer-relevant evidence concentrated in local text spans. Together, these findings support a local co-occurrence activation (LCA) interpretation: the probe-time benefit of fixed rationales arises mainly from the words they contain and short-range word co-occurrences.
Title:What Does Chain-of-Thought Contribute at Probe Time? Evidence for Local Co-Occurrence Activation
Abstract:Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting enhances large language model performance, yet what drives these gains remains unclear. We study this question from a probe-time perspective: holding CoT rationales fixed, we test which textual properties matter for the final prediction. Across multiple datasets and model configurations, we find that randomizing the order of rationale sentences has little effect on accuracy, suggesting that the global order of reasoning steps is not the main source of the probe-time benefit. Moreover, even when the words in a rationale are randomly reordered, performance remains well above the no-rationale baseline, indicating that the rationale's words remain useful even without their original order. Restoring only short-range word order further improves performance and brings it substantially closer to full CoT. In most settings, much of this local-order gain is already obtained with three-word windows. Control experiments rule out explicit answer copying, simple lexical cues, generic topical context, and general robustness to shuffling as the main explanations. Mechanistic analyses further show that short-window gains are largely formed in early-to-middle model layers, with answer-relevant evidence concentrated in local text spans. Together, these findings support a local co-occurrence activation (LCA) interpretation: the probe-time benefit of fixed rationales arises mainly from the words they contain and short-range word co-occurrences.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2605.26795 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2605.26795v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.26795 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 309 words
Related coverage

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · Aug 26, 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026
Construct validity of Claude Opus 4.8's System Card – A commentary
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026

AGI Safety and Alignment at Google DeepMind: A Summary of Recent Work (July 2026)
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 31, 2026