aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that standard activation-based discovery metrics in Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) fail to predict intervention effects, revealing a significant gap between observational correlation and causal attribution. The authors establish gradient-based intervention attribution as a superior, principled method for selecting latent features for steering or ablation tasks, outperforming traditional probe coefficients by orders of magnitude.
What Do Sparse Autoencoder Feature Discovery Scores Identify? From Activations to Interventions
arXiv:2610.15850v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse autoencoder (SAE) features are typically discovered from how their activations co-vary with behaviour, yet they are often used through interventions such as steering or ablation. We take intervention attribution, the first-order effect of a specified intervention on the model output, as our estimand. For a broad class of response functions, we show that observational feature-discovery evidence generally does not identify this attribution, and derive an exact gradient-based decomposition of the gap between linear-probe predictions and intervention attribution. Across four model-SAE pairs, median probe-to-attribution magnitude ratios range from tens to hundreds, while attributions closely track small-step steering. For single-latent ablations with nonzero effects, gradient predictions match the realized sign in 91-97% of cases, compared with 17-35% for probe-implied changes. Attribution-selected sets also produce larger absolute mean ablation effects on held-out prompts than sets selected by correlation, rank tests or probe coefficients. Together, these results establish intervention attribution as a principled, gradient-estimable target for selecting SAE features for intervention.
Title:What Do Sparse Autoencoder Feature Discovery Scores Identify? From Activations to Interventions
Abstract:Sparse autoencoder (SAE) features are typically discovered from how their activations co-vary with behaviour, yet they are often used through interventions such as steering or ablation. We take intervention attribution, the first-order effect of a specified intervention on the model output, as our estimand. For a broad class of response functions, we show that observational feature-discovery evidence generally does not identify this attribution, and derive an exact gradient-based decomposition of the gap between linear-probe predictions and intervention attribution. Across four model-SAE pairs, median probe-to-attribution magnitude ratios range from tens to hundreds, while attributions closely track small-step steering. For single-latent ablations with nonzero effects, gradient predictions match the realized sign in 91-97% of cases, compared with 17-35% for probe-implied changes. Attribution-selected sets also produce larger absolute mean ablation effects on held-out prompts than sets selected by correlation, rank tests or probe coefficients. Together, these results establish intervention attribution as a principled, gradient-estimable target for selecting SAE features for intervention.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2610.15850 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.15850v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15850 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 271 words
Related coverage

How do neural networks regress cubic polynomials? Apparently, they use a trick invented in Milan 500 years ago
LessWrong · Jul 22, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026
PULSE: Identifying Demonstration-Utility Features with Sparse Autoencoders
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
Recurrence Is Not Enough: Causally Validating Multilingual SAE Translation Features in Gemma 2 and 3
arXiv · Sep 7, 2026