Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

WASIL introduces a significant dataset of in-the-wild Arabic voice interactions, specifically designed to disentangle automatic speech recognition errors from genuine model limitations in handling dialects and ambiguous requests. By providing gold transcripts and explicit feedback labels, this resource enables more rigorous evaluation of cascaded ASR-LLM systems for low-resource languages. The work directly advances the field by addressing critical challenges in real-world voice assistant deployment beyond standard benchmark tasks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

WASIL: In-the-Wild Arabic Spoken Interactions with LLMs

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.16364v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) voice assistants are commonly built as cascaded Automatic Speech recognition (ASR) to LLM systems, where recognition errors can distort user intent. Dislikes may also arise from ambiguous, out-of-domain, or non-request turns, making it hard to isolate ASR effects. We release WASIL (it denotes connection or linking in Arabic): in-the-wild Arabic spoken interaction prompts with audio, ASR hypotheses, assistant responses, and explicit like/dislike feedback (8,529 turns; 14.2% dislikes), plus a 2,000-turn test set covering Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and four major dialects with their labels. We provide low-cost gold transcripts via multi-ASR agreement-guided post-editing and annotate answerability (answerable, ambiguous/needs-clarification, unsupported, not-a-request/noise) to separate intrinsic unanswerability from ASR-induced degradation. Finally, we describe scalable reference-free evaluation of responses from ASR vs. gold transcripts using multi-judge LLM scoring.

Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) voice assistants are commonly built as cascaded Automatic Speech recognition (ASR) to LLM systems, where recognition errors can distort user intent. Dislikes may also arise from ambiguous, out-of-domain, or non-request turns, making it hard to isolate ASR effects. We release WASIL (it denotes connection or linking in Arabic): in-the-wild Arabic spoken interaction prompts with audio, ASR hypotheses, assistant responses, and explicit like/dislike feedback (8,529 turns; 14.2% dislikes), plus a 2,000-turn test set covering Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and four major dialects with their labels. We provide low-cost gold transcripts via multi-ASR agreement-guided post-editing and annotate answerability (answerable, ambiguous/needs-clarification, unsupported, not-a-request/noise) to separate intrinsic unanswerability from ASR-induced degradation. Finally, we describe scalable reference-free evaluation of responses from ASR vs. gold transcripts using multi-judge LLM scoring.

Sound (cs.SD); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2605.16364 [cs.SD]

(or arXiv:2605.16364v3 [cs.SD] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16364 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 226 words

Related coverage