aiqbench analysis
The author revises an earlier claim: that Anthropic's Claude Mythos, if leaked as open weights, would have posed a societal-scale cyber threat. They argue that open-weight models such as GLM-5.3 already cross a similar capability threshold without the expected fallout, and that the recent surge in vulnerability disclosures may reflect defenders scaling up rather than a single model's effect. For AI readers, the key question is whether capability thresholds for offensive cyber use are being judged accurately, since the piece is an opinion and the evidence it cites is thin.
Was I wrong about open models & cyber risks?

Last week coined the term “Black October“ after an onslaught of critical vulnerability disclosures, including PHP2Shell and a long-standing GitLab bug, signified the moment when the cyber risks of AI models started to materialize.
Last week coined the term “Black October“ after an onslaught of critical vulnerability disclosures, including PHP2Shell and GitLab, signified the moment when the cyber risks of AI models started to materialize. It seemed like the news cycle had stabilized a bit when I started writing this, but then there was news about another major crypto security incident at Binance. The crypto industry has a very long history of hacks, so it’s not the best industry to indicate vulnerabilities translating into new societal harm. Still, we are very much still living through the implications of this. The best guess for what is happening in the cybersecurity space is that the behind the scenes work has only accelerated, bringing more people and resources in to try and patch the internet — the Wall Street Journal reported that cyber first responders are strained, which seems like the system working. We’re living through this plot of an exponential rise in vulnerabilities, which will take a long time to level off at the top of the sigmoid. A few weeks ago, before the rapid acceleration in vulnerability disclosures and the uptick in reported hacks, I wrote the following take. It’s been getting a pretty consistent…
Excerpt shown under the publisher's RSS terms · 200 words · full text and figures are on the publisher's site
Related coverage

Why do models *really* fail on HLE tasks?
LessWrong · Sep 28, 2026
Dialogue with Eliezer Yudkowsky on Neural Networks
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026
Evaluating Risks in Weak-to-Strong Alignment: A Bias-Variance Perspective
arXiv · Jul 24, 2026

Hint-based CoT faithfulness evals still mostly work on Claude
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026