aiqbench analysis
VStress introduces a novel framework for optimizing repeated verifier calls by treating correlation as a quantifiable metric rather than a post-hoc warning. By estimating conditional marginal information and adapting budget allocation based on call costs, the system effectively halts redundant queries to improve balanced accuracy under varying corruption levels. This approach transforms uncertainty management into an auditable decision process, offering significant efficiency gains for systems relying on repeated oracle interactions.
VStress: Correlation-Aware Auditing and Adaptive Budget Allocation for Repeated Verifiers
arXiv:2609.36958v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Repeated verifier calls are useful only when they contribute conditional information. We introduce VStress, an auditable replay contract, and VStress-CA, a correlation-aware allocation policy that estimates the conditional marginal information of an unqueried verifier on a sealed calibration split, discounts uncertainty, normalizes by call cost, and stops or abstains when the next call is not informative. The controller freezes its decision and cost ledger before joining the clean oracle; a dependence-shift alarm disables channel preference and falls back to exact-stop. The controlled audit gives the mechanism boundary: at 35% symmetric corruption, majority-5 improves balanced accuracy from 0.6578 to 0.7739, whereas at 65% it loses 0.1226 points. In the matched fixed-budget comparison, breadth, redundancy, and adaptive allocation obtain balanced accuracies 0.6048, 0.6375, and 0.6538, with 3.4216 calls per item and an RLVR score of 0.6417 for VStress-CA. Dependence diagnostics also increase from same-model repeats to cross-family channels, with conditional marginal gains of 0.0126, 0.0462, and 0.0913. These measurements turn correlation from a post-hoc warning into an auditable allocation decision.
Abstract:Repeated verifier calls are useful only when they contribute conditional information. We introduce VStress, an auditable replay contract, and VStress-CA, a correlation-aware allocation policy that estimates the conditional marginal information of an unqueried verifier on a sealed calibration split, discounts uncertainty, normalizes by call cost, and stops or abstains when the next call is not informative. The controller freezes its decision and cost ledger before joining the clean oracle; a dependence-shift alarm disables channel preference and falls back to exact-stop. The controlled audit gives the mechanism boundary: at 35% symmetric corruption, majority-5 improves balanced accuracy from 0.6578 to 0.7739, whereas at 65% it loses 0.1226 points. In the matched fixed-budget comparison, breadth, redundancy, and adaptive allocation obtain balanced accuracies 0.6048, 0.6375, and 0.6538, with 3.4216 calls per item and an RLVR score of 0.6417 for VStress-CA. Dependence diagnostics also increase from same-model repeats to cross-family channels, with conditional marginal gains of 0.0126, 0.0462, and 0.0913. These measurements turn correlation from a post-hoc warning into an auditable allocation decision.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
arXiv:2609.36958 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.36958v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36958 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 273 words
Related coverage

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · Sep 27, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Improving CoT Monitorability of Evaluation Awareness via Verbalization Training
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026