aiqbench analysis
This vision paper proposes integrating uncertainty estimation into proactive smart assistants to distinguish between reliable predictions, group-level assumptions, and intrinsic user variability. By addressing the "unknowns" in preference modeling, the research aims to significantly improve alignment and downstream behavior in human-computer interaction scenarios. The work represents a foundational step toward more robust and trustworthy AI agents that can explicitly communicate confidence levels rather than acting on opaque likelihood scores.
Vision: "What Don't I Know About User's Preferences?" How Uncertainty Estimation Improves Proactive Assistant Alignment
arXiv:2610.15948v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Proactive Smart Assistants (PSAs) increasingly use general knowledge, learned patterns from group-level data, patterns from individual user's data, and recent sensor observations to anticipate which action a user may prefer. Existing systems typically select actions from predicted user preference likelihoods, but these likelihoods alone do not reveal how reliable the prediction is, which evidence supports it, or why ambiguity remains. In this vision paper, we argue that uncertainty estimation can provide this missing information and substantially change appropriate downstream behavior. Using the example of a home assistant, we introduce the questions that uncertainty estimation aims to answer, i.e. how sure is the assistant about the predicted preference likelihood, whether the confidence come from group-level assumptions or individual's data, and whether likelihood ambiguity reflect the user's intrinsic preference variability or insufficient data for the particular situation. We further introduce uncertainty estimation applications in neighboring domains, such as human trajectory prediction, personalized activity recognition, information-collection, and model-based control. Finally, we draw on insights from neighboring domains to envision how future uncertainty-aware proactive assistants may address key challenges in proactive interaction.
Title:Vision: "What Don't I Know About User's Preferences?" How Uncertainty Estimation Improves Proactive Assistant Alignment
Abstract:Proactive Smart Assistants (PSAs) increasingly use general knowledge, learned patterns from group-level data, patterns from individual user's data, and recent sensor observations to anticipate which action a user may prefer. Existing systems typically select actions from predicted user preference likelihoods, but these likelihoods alone do not reveal how reliable the prediction is, which evidence supports it, or why ambiguity remains. In this vision paper, we argue that uncertainty estimation can provide this missing information and substantially change appropriate downstream behavior. Using the example of a home assistant, we introduce the questions that uncertainty estimation aims to answer, i.e. how sure is the assistant about the predicted preference likelihood, whether the confidence come from group-level assumptions or individual's data, and whether likelihood ambiguity reflect the user's intrinsic preference variability or insufficient data for the particular situation. We further introduce uncertainty estimation applications in neighboring domains, such as human trajectory prediction, personalized activity recognition, information-collection, and model-based control. Finally, we draw on insights from neighboring domains to envision how future uncertainty-aware proactive assistants may address key challenges in proactive interaction.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
arXiv:2610.15948 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.15948v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15948 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.1145/3798063.3839206 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 300 words
Related coverage
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026

A Candid Abacus AI Review: The All-in-One AI Platform for Professionals & Enterprises
KDnuggets · Sep 10, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026