aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that pretrained vision-language models can function as autonomous agents capable of controlling closed-loop optical experiments without relying on pre-defined numerical objectives. By interpreting sparse visual feedback and issuing actuator commands, these VLMs successfully resolve ambiguities and actively generate informative data in complex setups like interferometers and optical cavities. The study establishes optics as a physically grounded testbed for advancing active perception and scientific reasoning within AI agents.
Vision-Language Agents for Active Perception in Optics Laboratories
arXiv:2609.32918v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly being used in scientific workflows, but their ability as agents to directly control laboratory experiments from visual feedback remains underexplored. This capability is important because many laboratory tasks do not naturally provide dense, pre-defined numerical objectives: informative signals can be sparse, intermittent, or visually ambiguous. A more general laboratory agent should instead be able to interpret visual observations, take actions to acquire useful feedback, and adapt its behavior based on the consequences of those actions. We study whether general-purpose VLMs can perform this kind of closed-loop scientific control using experimental optics as a testbed. We evaluate agents on three experimental systems that isolate distinct capabilities: a Michelson interferometer, a two-mirror cavity, and a four-mirror optical relay. The agents observe camera images, directly issue actuator and measurement commands, and retain their interaction history without receiving an engineered scalar objective during control. Across these experiments and matched simulations, we find that, given task-specific natural-language guidance, VLMs can estimate actuator-response relationships, resolve ambiguous observations through intervention, and actively create informative visual feedback when signals are sparse. These results suggest that pretrained multimodal models can serve as important decision-making agents within the experimental loop. Our work also establishes optics as a physically grounded testbed for visual reasoning and active perception in scientific agents.
Abstract:Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly being used in scientific workflows, but their ability as agents to directly control laboratory experiments from visual feedback remains underexplored. This capability is important because many laboratory tasks do not naturally provide dense, pre-defined numerical objectives: informative signals can be sparse, intermittent, or visually ambiguous. A more general laboratory agent should instead be able to interpret visual observations, take actions to acquire useful feedback, and adapt its behavior based on the consequences of those actions. We study whether general-purpose VLMs can perform this kind of closed-loop scientific control using experimental optics as a testbed. We evaluate agents on three experimental systems that isolate distinct capabilities: a Michelson interferometer, a two-mirror cavity, and a four-mirror optical relay. The agents observe camera images, directly issue actuator and measurement commands, and retain their interaction history without receiving an engineered scalar objective during control. Across these experiments and matched simulations, we find that, given task-specific natural-language guidance, VLMs can estimate actuator-response relationships, resolve ambiguous observations through intervention, and actively create informative visual feedback when signals are sparse. These results suggest that pretrained multimodal models can serve as important decision-making agents within the experimental loop. Our work also establishes optics as a physically grounded testbed for visual reasoning and active perception in scientific agents.
Optics (physics.optics); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.32918 [physics.optics]
(or arXiv:2609.32918v1 [physics.optics] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32918 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 318 words
Related coverage

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026

Article: The AI Productivity Paradox in Test Automation: Moving beyond Structural Validation to Perception and Intent
InfoQ · Jun 1, 2026

The Machines that Make the Machines
NVIDIA · Oct 7, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026