aiqbench analysis
Vimarsha introduces a critical 100-hour benchmark addressing systematic biases in Indian language ASR evaluation by incorporating diverse, real-world audio and flexible transcription standards. This dataset reveals significant performance disparities among state-of-the-art models under realistic acoustic conditions, offering researchers a more robust metric for assessing true model capabilities across demographic and linguistic variations.
Vimarsha: Faithful ASR Evaluation for Indian Languages with Demographic Diversity, In-the-Wild Audio and Spelling Variations
arXiv:2609.24199v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluation benchmarks for Indian language automatic speech recognition (ASR) suffer from two systematic biases: optimistic scores from clean, controlled audio conditions, and pessimistic scores from overly rigid transcription standards that penalize valid linguistic variations. We introduce Vimarsha, a 100-hour benchmark spanning all 22 scheduled Indian languages, designed to address both distortions. Vimarsha combines demographically diverse on-field recordings with carefully mined in-the-wild audio selected for acoustic difficulty, alongside a lattice of variations framework that encodes multiple valid transcriptions per utterance. Evaluations of 10 state-of-the-art ASR models reveal substantial shifts in model rankings under realistic conditions, geographic and demographic performance disparities, and systematic failure modes across speaking rates and acoustic environments.
Abstract:Evaluation benchmarks for Indian language automatic speech recognition (ASR) suffer from two systematic biases: optimistic scores from clean, controlled audio conditions, and pessimistic scores from overly rigid transcription standards that penalize valid linguistic variations. We introduce Vimarsha, a 100-hour benchmark spanning all 22 scheduled Indian languages, designed to address both distortions. Vimarsha combines demographically diverse on-field recordings with carefully mined in-the-wild audio selected for acoustic difficulty, alongside a lattice of variations framework that encodes multiple valid transcriptions per utterance. Evaluations of 10 state-of-the-art ASR models reveal substantial shifts in model rankings under realistic conditions, geographic and demographic performance disparities, and systematic failure modes across speaking rates and acoustic environments.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.24199 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.24199v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24199 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 204 words
Related coverage
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026
The Failure Happens Before the Drift: The Social Dynamics of Values in LLM Agent Societies
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026
The Open ASR Leaderboard Adds Its First Global South Language
Hugging Face · Aug 28, 2026