Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper proposes a cheaper alternative to optimal transport distances for comparing distributions whose samples are themselves probability measures. The vertical sliced Wasserstein distance projects each inner measure with test functions and then uses one-dimensional Wasserstein distance, with claimed proofs of metric validity, weak-convergence metrization, and dimension-independent statistical guarantees. For ML readers, the key questions are how it performs on real high-dimensional workloads and how the practical particle gradient scales compared with existing meta-measure methods.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Vertical Sliced Wasserstein Distances for Meta-Measures

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.20743v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many modern learning problems require comparing probability distributions whose individual observations are themselves probability measures, naturally giving rise to meta-measures in $\mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(\Omega))$. However, optimal transport distances on this space can be prohibitively expensive to evaluate. We introduce the vertical sliced Wasserstein ($\mathrm{VSW}$) distance, a scalable metric on $\mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(\Omega))$. Rather than slicing along the transport geometry of $\mathcal{P}(\Omega)$, $\mathrm{VSW}$ projects each inner measure using continuous test functions and compares the resulting one-dimensional distributions with one-dimensional Wasserstein distance. We prove that $\mathrm{VSW}$ is a valid metric on $\mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(\Omega))$, metrizes weak convergence, and admits dimension-independent statistical convergence guarantees. Empirically, $\mathrm{VSW}$ provides high accuracy and efficiency compared with existing distances for meta-measures. We further derive a practical particle gradient for the empirical $\mathrm{VSW}_2^2$ objective and demonstrate its use for gradient-based transport of meta-measures. $\mathrm{VSW}$ provides a simple and scalable alternative for comparing and optimizing distributions of distributions.

Abstract:Many modern learning problems require comparing probability distributions whose individual observations are themselves probability measures, naturally giving rise to meta-measures in $\mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(\Omega))$. However, optimal transport distances on this space can be prohibitively expensive to evaluate. We introduce the vertical sliced Wasserstein ($\mathrm{VSW}$) distance, a scalable metric on $\mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(\Omega))$. Rather than slicing along the transport geometry of $\mathcal{P}(\Omega)$, $\mathrm{VSW}$ projects each inner measure using continuous test functions and compares the resulting one-dimensional distributions with one-dimensional Wasserstein distance. We prove that $\mathrm{VSW}$ is a valid metric on $\mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(\Omega))$, metrizes weak convergence, and admits dimension-independent statistical convergence guarantees. Empirically, $\mathrm{VSW}$ provides high accuracy and efficiency compared with existing distances for meta-measures. We further derive a practical particle gradient for the empirical $\mathrm{VSW}_2^2$ objective and demonstrate its use for gradient-based transport of meta-measures. $\mathrm{VSW}$ provides a simple and scalable alternative for comparing and optimizing distributions of distributions.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.20743 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.20743v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20743 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 235 words

Related coverage