aiqbench analysis
This research investigates the computational complexity of verifying classical shadows and predicting higher-order quantum properties from lower-order data, establishing rigorous hardness bounds for various shadow types. The findings reveal fundamental limits on spoofing quantum state information and provide new insights into the hierarchy between quantum and classical proof systems. These results are critical for understanding the security and reliability of quantum state tomography protocols in near-term applications.
Verification Complexity and Extension of Classical Shadows
arXiv:2609.40107v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Classical shadows are an influential framework for compressing copies of a given quantum state $\rho$ into classical data $S$, enabling many properties of $\rho$ to be predicted from relatively few copies. In this work, we study two natural questions involving shadows: (1) Given $S$, when can one efficiently verify that $S$ came from a genuine $n$-qubit state? This is called the Classical Shadow Validity (CSV) problem, introduced by Karaiskos, Rudolph, Meyer, Eisert, and Gharibian [ICALP 2026]. (2) Given $S$ that allows one to capture 2-local properties of $\rho$, can one fake or spoof a shadow $S'$ which predicts 3-local properties of some state? For (1), we show CSV is efficiently solvable for permutation-invariant shadows, QMA-hard for real, fermionic, and bosonic shadows, and both coNP-hard and QMA-hard when the observable family consists of all $n$-qubit Pauli strings. A result of independent interest along the way is a new upper bound qc-$\Sigma_2$ $\subseteq$ $\mathrm{P}^{\mathrm{PP}}$, where qc-$\Sigma_2$ is a quantum analogue of the second level of the polynomial hierarchy in which the first proof is quantum. For (2), we show intractability: Given the 2-local marginals $S$ of a quantum state $\rho$, estimating the 3-local marginals of $\rho$ is intractable unless QCMA $\subseteq$ BPP, even if the state $\rho$ is the unique state consistent with $S$.
Abstract:Classical shadows are an influential framework for compressing copies of a given quantum state $\rho$ into classical data $S$, enabling many properties of $\rho$ to be predicted from relatively few copies. In this work, we study two natural questions involving shadows: (1) Given $S$, when can one efficiently verify that $S$ came from a genuine $n$-qubit state? This is called the Classical Shadow Validity (CSV) problem, introduced by Karaiskos, Rudolph, Meyer, Eisert, and Gharibian [ICALP 2026]. (2) Given $S$ that allows one to capture 2-local properties of $\rho$, can one fake or spoof a shadow $S'$ which predicts 3-local properties of some state? For (1), we show CSV is efficiently solvable for permutation-invariant shadows, QMA-hard for real, fermionic, and bosonic shadows, and both coNP-hard and QMA-hard when the observable family consists of all $n$-qubit Pauli strings. A result of independent interest along the way is a new upper bound qc-$\Sigma_2$ $\subseteq$ $\mathrm{P}^{\mathrm{PP}}$, where qc-$\Sigma_2$ is a quantum analogue of the second level of the polynomial hierarchy in which the first proof is quantum. For (2), we show intractability: Given the 2-local marginals $S$ of a quantum state $\rho$, estimating the 3-local marginals of $\rho$ is intractable unless QCMA $\subseteq$ BPP, even if the state $\rho$ is the unique state consistent with $S$.
arXiv:2609.40107 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.40107v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.40107 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 303 words
Related coverage

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · Aug 4, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Researchers Compute Cloud Cover Models Using Quantum Shadows and Series Approximations
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 21, 2026

Western Australia Team Hits 92·9% Fidelity in State Prep
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 8, 2026