Verifiably grounded machine interpretation of lunar geology

Abstract:Planetary geology relies on historical, interpretive reasoning to reconstruct past events from diverse observations. Here, we investigate how far this interpretive workflow can be automated by a multimodal vision-language model. Focusing on the stratigraphy of lunar basaltic mare volcanism, we train a model to generate verifiably grounded geologic interpretations directly from co-registered topographic, spectral, and geologic maps. We demonstrate that while the system successfully balances established geological priors with local visual evidence to accurately describe stratigraphy and terrain, numeric age dating derived solely from vision defaults to memorized priors. Integrating an open-book retrieval mechanism resolves this, enabling the model to faithfully cite published chronologies. Our findings delineate the necessary architecture for automated geologic inference: site evidence must be visually interpreted from local data, while quantitative historical context must be retrieved from the scientific record.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2608.09276 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.09276v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.09276 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.