Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research presents a novel method for steering large language models by disentangling normative values from semantic content, ensuring factual preservation while adjusting ethical priorities. By utilizing one-way mixing pathways and stop-gradient techniques on frozen residual states, the approach significantly reduces benign refusals and contradictions without compromising alignment scores. The findings offer critical insights into optimizing model behavior for real-world deployment where maintaining context accuracy is as vital as enforcing safety guidelines.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Values as Style: Disentangling Values from Semantics with One-Way Mixing for Low-Damage LLM Steering

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.39701v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Value steering should change an LLM's normative priorities while preserving the scenario, facts, and task constraints underlying its answer. Conventional activation edits often change both. We introduce an editable semantic-value interface on frozen residual states, with a one-way semantic-to-value pathway that grounds value recognition in context. Stop-gradient blocks feedback through this pathway; swap consistency, topic de-confounding, and decorrelation encourage selective codes. At inference, editing the value code produces a residual delta while holding the semantic code fixed. On two instruction-tuned backbones, this interface improves semantic preservation and reduces benign refusals at comparable value alignment. A matched mixing-by-gating ablation separates representation learning from selective edit activation, and dimension-matched probes establish improved code selectivity. Against validation-selected prompting on LLaMA-3.1-8B, the method achieves comparable alignment (0.750 vs. 0.748), higher BERTScore (0.938 vs. 0.923), and fewer contradictions (5.1% vs. 7.6%). Human ratings and cross-taxonomy controls provide complementary evidence for low-damage value steering.

Abstract:Value steering should change an LLM's normative priorities while preserving the scenario, facts, and task constraints underlying its answer. Conventional activation edits often change both. We introduce an editable semantic-value interface on frozen residual states, with a one-way semantic-to-value pathway that grounds value recognition in context. Stop-gradient blocks feedback through this pathway; swap consistency, topic de-confounding, and decorrelation encourage selective codes. At inference, editing the value code produces a residual delta while holding the semantic code fixed. On two instruction-tuned backbones, this interface improves semantic preservation and reduces benign refusals at comparable value alignment. A matched mixing-by-gating ablation separates representation learning from selective edit activation, and dimension-matched probes establish improved code selectivity. Against validation-selected prompting on LLaMA-3.1-8B, the method achieves comparable alignment (0.750 vs. 0.748), higher BERTScore (0.938 vs. 0.923), and fewer contradictions (5.1% vs. 7.6%). Human ratings and cross-taxonomy controls provide complementary evidence for low-damage value steering.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.39701 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.39701v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.39701 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 249 words

Related coverage