Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces VakyArth, the first pragmatic benchmark for Indic languages, revealing consistent failures in current LLMs to interpret context-dependent meanings like deixis and implicature within these linguistic families. The study highlights a critical gap where models generate fluent translations that lack cultural nuance, particularly affecting Dravidian languages compared to Indo-Aryan ones. This diagnostic evaluation underscores the urgent need for culturally grounded training data to advance AI competence beyond literal text processing in underrepresented regions.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

VakyArth: Evaluating Pragmatic Competence in LLMs across Indic Languages

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.01788v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Real-world communication often requires pragmatic reasoning: interpreting meanings implied through context and cultural convention rather than stated literally. Existing pragmatic evaluation remains largely limited to English and high-resource languages, leaving Indic languages unexplored despite their linguistic and cultural diversity. We introduce VakyArth, the first pragmatic benchmark for Indic languages, designed as a diagnostic evaluation covering Hindi, Punjabi, Tamil, and Malayalam. VakyArth evaluates models across five phenomena: deixis, speech acts, implicature, social pragmatics, and coherence; through multiple-choice questions, natural language inference, and translation, with all items authored by native speakers. Across multilingual large language models (LLMs) of varying families and sizes, we find consistent failures on pragmatic meanings rooted in Indic linguistic and cultural conventions. Our analysis shows systematic differences across languages and tasks: MCQ accuracy exceeds NLI accuracy in all model-language combinations, translation performance does not reliably track pragmatic understanding, and Indo-Aryan languages show a translation advantage over Dravidian languages. We further show that automatic translation metrics can miss fluent but pragmatically unfaithful outputs, especially for implicature and deixis.

Abstract:Real-world communication often requires pragmatic reasoning: interpreting meanings implied through context and cultural convention rather than stated literally. Existing pragmatic evaluation remains largely limited to English and high-resource languages, leaving Indic languages unexplored despite their linguistic and cultural diversity. We introduce VakyArth, the first pragmatic benchmark for Indic languages, designed as a diagnostic evaluation covering Hindi, Punjabi, Tamil, and Malayalam. VakyArth evaluates models across five phenomena: deixis, speech acts, implicature, social pragmatics, and coherence; through multiple-choice questions, natural language inference, and translation, with all items authored by native speakers. Across multilingual large language models (LLMs) of varying families and sizes, we find consistent failures on pragmatic meanings rooted in Indic linguistic and cultural conventions. Our analysis shows systematic differences across languages and tasks: MCQ accuracy exceeds NLI accuracy in all model-language combinations, translation performance does not reliably track pragmatic understanding, and Indo-Aryan languages show a translation advantage over Dravidian languages. We further show that automatic translation metrics can miss fluent but pragmatically unfaithful outputs, especially for implicature and deixis.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.01788 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.01788v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01788 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 267 words

Related coverage