Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research presents a computationally efficient method for automated creativity assessment using Poly-Encoders, achieving performance comparable to large language models while significantly reducing resource requirements. By leveraging small pre-trained BERT encoders on the Scientific Creative Thinking Test, the study demonstrates that high accuracy (Pearson r = 0.74) is attainable without relying on massive LLM infrastructure. This approach offers a scalable solution for practical applications in education and other contexts where computational efficiency is critical.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Using Poly-Encoders for Computationally Efficient Automated Creativity Assessment

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.26165v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated creativity assessment has been a long standing challenge, with traditional methods often being resource intensive or lacking practical accuracy. We introduce a novel approach by using Poly-Encoder for computationally efficient and accurate automated creativity assessment. We fine-tuned a Poly-Encoder on a public dataset from the Scientific Creative Thinking Test, comprised of approximately 18,000 human-rated question responses. Our method leverages small pre-trained BERT encoders, achieving performance comparable to fine-tuned Large Language Models while significantly reducing computational demands. Experiments with the BERT-family models and poly-code counts achieved Pearson correlations of up to r = 0.74, 95% CI [0.73, 0.75] with human raters, matching the performance of resource intensive LLMs. This study bridges the gap between high performance and computational efficiency, potentially enabling widespread implementation of automated creativity assessment on accessible consumer-grade hardware. With some limitations, our findings suggest that Poly-Encoders are a promising alternative to LLMs for practical, scalable creativity assessment in various contexts, especially educational.

Abstract:Automated creativity assessment has been a long standing challenge, with traditional methods often being resource intensive or lacking practical accuracy. We introduce a novel approach by using Poly-Encoder for computationally efficient and accurate automated creativity assessment. We fine-tuned a Poly-Encoder on a public dataset from the Scientific Creative Thinking Test, comprised of approximately 18,000 human-rated question responses. Our method leverages small pre-trained BERT encoders, achieving performance comparable to fine-tuned Large Language Models while significantly reducing computational demands. Experiments with the BERT-family models and poly-code counts achieved Pearson correlations of up to r = 0.74, 95% CI [0.73, 0.75] with human raters, matching the performance of resource intensive LLMs. This study bridges the gap between high performance and computational efficiency, potentially enabling widespread implementation of automated creativity assessment on accessible consumer-grade hardware. With some limitations, our findings suggest that Poly-Encoders are a promising alternative to LLMs for practical, scalable creativity assessment in various contexts, especially educational.

Accepted at AIED 2026. The final authenticated version is available online at this https URL

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.26165 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.26165v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26165 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 266 words

Related coverage