aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates that while small context windows mimic human working memory limits, larger windows are essential for modeling long-range discourse structures like coreference resolution. By disrupting entity chains, the researchers found that preserving these structural linkages significantly improves the alignment between language model predictions and actual human reading behavior. The findings clarify how global discourse relations contribute to psycholinguistic fit, offering a more nuanced approach to simulating human comprehension in LMs.
Using LMs to Model the Effects of Context and Coreference during Sentence Comprehension
arXiv:2609.32119v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models (LMs) are often used as a tool to model human language processing. Recent studies suggest that severely restricting LMs' context window improves their fit to human psycholinguistic data by simulating human working memory constraints. However, it is possible that this strict memory-decay approach overlooks humans' reliance on long-range structural representations, such as discourse structre. In this work, we systematically vary the context window size of GPT-2 across four large-scale naturalistic English reading-time datasets and observe a U-shaped relationship: Although restricted contexts (< 20 tokens) successfully capture local memory limitations, expanded contexts (500--1,000 tokens) ultimately yield the highest overall psycholinguistic fit. To investigate the mechanism driving this benefit, we conduct a counterfactual inference-time experiment that disrupts cross-sentential entity chains by pronominalizing repeated discourse entities. Obscuring these structural linkages significantly degrades the predictive power of larger context windows by 20% to 40%. Our experiments demonstrate that tracking long-range coreference relations is one important factor for the alignment between LM surprisal and human reading behavior, and approximate the extent to which human comprehenders use global discourse relations during language processing.
Abstract:Language models (LMs) are often used as a tool to model human language processing. Recent studies suggest that severely restricting LMs' context window improves their fit to human psycholinguistic data by simulating human working memory constraints. However, it is possible that this strict memory-decay approach overlooks humans' reliance on long-range structural representations, such as discourse structre. In this work, we systematically vary the context window size of GPT-2 across four large-scale naturalistic English reading-time datasets and observe a U-shaped relationship: Although restricted contexts (< 20 tokens) successfully capture local memory limitations, expanded contexts (500--1,000 tokens) ultimately yield the highest overall psycholinguistic fit. To investigate the mechanism driving this benefit, we conduct a counterfactual inference-time experiment that disrupts cross-sentential entity chains by pronominalizing repeated discourse entities. Obscuring these structural linkages significantly degrades the predictive power of larger context windows by 20% to 40%. Our experiments demonstrate that tracking long-range coreference relations is one important factor for the alignment between LM surprisal and human reading behavior, and approximate the extent to which human comprehenders use global discourse relations during language processing.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.32119 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.32119v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32119 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 274 words
Related coverage

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026

MedPAIR: Measuring Whether Physicians and AI Agree on What Matters in Medical QA
Snorkel AI Blog · Oct 2, 2026
Modeling semantic association in self-paced reading with language model embeddings
arXiv · Jun 8, 2026
Synthetic document finetuning for instilling positive traits
AI Alignment Forum · Jun 16, 2026