aiqbench analysis
This research applies Koopmanism and composition operators to mathematically formalize Large Language Model transformations as infinite-dimensional operators, revealing structural properties like isometry and spectral pollution. By constructing finite-dimensional approximations, the study provides a rigorous framework for comparing tasks and models through singular value spectra, moving beyond empirical black-box analysis toward interpretable dynamical systems theory.
Using Composition Operators to Linearize LLM Semantic Transformations
arXiv:2609.22143v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning learns functions: prompt to response, image to caption. What these functions are mathematically remains hard to say. We present a method to approximate these kinds of transformations using techniques from dynamical systems that fall under the umbrella of Koopmanism. We introduce the use of composition operators, which generalize the Koopman operator and, crucially, can map between distinct spaces, motivating the perspective that LLM transformations are rectangular infinite-dimensional operators. This formalism reveals useful structure: under natural assumptions on the prompt and response distributions, the LLM operator is an isometry, and misalignment between learned representations manifests as spectral pollution of its finite sections. We then outline a method of constructing finite-dimensional approximations of an LLM operator, and demonstrate how the singular value spectrum can be used to compare tasks and models.
Abstract:Machine learning learns functions: prompt to response, image to caption. What these functions are mathematically remains hard to say. We present a method to approximate these kinds of transformations using techniques from dynamical systems that fall under the umbrella of Koopmanism. We introduce the use of composition operators, which generalize the Koopman operator and, crucially, can map between distinct spaces, motivating the perspective that LLM transformations are rectangular infinite-dimensional operators. This formalism reveals useful structure: under natural assumptions on the prompt and response distributions, the LLM operator is an isometry, and misalignment between learned representations manifests as spectral pollution of its finite sections. We then outline a method of constructing finite-dimensional approximations of an LLM operator, and demonstrate how the singular value spectrum can be used to compare tasks and models.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Functional Analysis (math.FA)
arXiv:2609.22143 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.22143v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22143 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 230 words
Related coverage

Reflections on unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026
Granite 4.1 LLMs: How They’re Built
Hugging Face · Apr 29, 2026
A Weisfeiler-Leman Characterization of Global-Attention Graph Transformers for Mixed-Integer Linear Programs
arXiv · Jul 21, 2026

Automating coherent long-form video generation
Google Research · Sep 24, 2026