Unknown Unknowns: Model Misspecification in Machine Learning for Physics

Abstract:Machine learning is now a central tool for solving inverse problems in particle physics and astronomy. Models are trained on simulation and deployed on real data, raising the question not just of whether they fit, but of whether they are wrong in ways we did not anticipate: the unknown unknowns. This challenge of model misspecification is not unique to machine learning. In physics, misspecification is sometimes exactly what we want to find: new discoveries appear as failures of existing models. At other times, we want such effects absorbed into the analysis without biasing the measurement. A robust analysis is one that absorbs the misspecifications we are not interested in, while preserving sensitivity to the ones we are. Machine learning can both amplify misspecification and provide new tools to address it. We discuss the challenges of model misspecification, diagnostics for detecting it, and strategies for mitigation. No single diagnostic can confirm that a model is correctly specified: detection and mitigation are two halves of an iterative loop, in which a battery of complementary diagnostics is applied, the model is updated, and the process repeated. Robustness against unknown unknowns is ultimately less about any single technique than about a disposition: a willingness to suspect one's own model, and to design analyses that can survive being wrong in ways one did not anticipate.

Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA); Machine Learning (cs.LG); High Energy Physics - Experiment (hep-ex); High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph)

arXiv:2608.13633 [physics.data-an]

(or arXiv:2608.13633v1 [physics.data-an] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.13633 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)