aiqbench analysis
UniVoice addresses the architectural challenge of unifying text-to-speech and singing synthesis by factorizing conditioning into content, melody, and timbre within a shared Diffusion Transformer backbone. The model successfully decouples melody constraints for singing from speech prosody using a learned null token, achieving performance comparable to dedicated TTS systems while outperforming unified baselines in singing tasks. This approach offers a scalable framework for audio generation that maintains flexibility for speech while preserving precise control for musical synthesis.
UniVoice: A Unified Model for Speech and Singing Voice Generation
arXiv:2606.05852v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Text-to-speech (TTS) and singing voice synthesis (SVS) both aim to generate human vocal audio from symbolic inputs, but they impose different requirements on the generation process. Speech generation relies on flexible, language-driven prosody, whereas singing generation requires explicit melody control and accurate rhythmic alignment. This mismatch makes it challenging to train a single model that can generate both natural speech and controllable singing, since melody-related conditions should strongly constrain singing but should not restrict speech prosody. We present UniVoice, a unified speech and singing voice generation framework based on conditional flow matching. Instead of using a single undifferentiated conditioning representation, UniVoice factorizes the condition into content, melody, and timbre, which are encoded by modality-appropriate encoders and consumed by a shared Diffusion Transformer (DiT) backbone. For singing, the melody condition is represented by MIDI note sequences; for speech, it is replaced with a learned null melody token, allowing the model to infer prosody from linguistic and acoustic context. This design preserves explicit melody control for singing while avoiding the need to impose melody constraints on speech. We further analyze the null melody token as an approximation to melody marginalization in the conditional flow. Trained on 30k hours of speech and 35k hours of singing data, UniVoice achieves a speech PER of 5.26\%, comparable to dedicated TTS systems such as F5-TTS (5.21\%) and CosyVoice3 (5.30\%). On singing generation, UniVoice achieves a PER of 16.22\%, outperforming the unified baseline Vevo1.5 (24.72\%).
Abstract:Text-to-speech (TTS) and singing voice synthesis (SVS) both aim to generate human vocal audio from symbolic inputs, but they impose different requirements on the generation process. Speech generation relies on flexible, language-driven prosody, whereas singing generation requires explicit melody control and accurate rhythmic alignment. This mismatch makes it challenging to train a single model that can generate both natural speech and controllable singing, since melody-related conditions should strongly constrain singing but should not restrict speech prosody. We present UniVoice, a unified speech and singing voice generation framework based on conditional flow matching. Instead of using a single undifferentiated conditioning representation, UniVoice factorizes the condition into content, melody, and timbre, which are encoded by modality-appropriate encoders and consumed by a shared Diffusion Transformer (DiT) backbone. For singing, the melody condition is represented by MIDI note sequences; for speech, it is replaced with a learned null melody token, allowing the model to infer prosody from linguistic and acoustic context. This design preserves explicit melody control for singing while avoiding the need to impose melody constraints on speech. We further analyze the null melody token as an approximation to melody marginalization in the conditional flow. Trained on 30k hours of speech and 35k hours of singing data, UniVoice achieves a speech PER of 5.26\%, comparable to dedicated TTS systems such as F5-TTS (5.21\%) and CosyVoice3 (5.30\%). On singing generation, UniVoice achieves a PER of 16.22\%, outperforming the unified baseline Vevo1.5 (24.72\%).
Sound (cs.SD); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)
arXiv:2606.05852 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2606.05852v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05852 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 339 words
Related coverage
[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026
VoiceDesigner: Text-to-Voice Generation and Editing via Unified Diffusion Modeling and Data Augmentation
arXiv · Aug 17, 2026
NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026
Build real-time voice applications with vLLM-Omni on SageMaker AI – Part 1
AWS · Sep 28, 2026