aiqbench analysis
This study provides a rigorous triple-robustness analysis revealing that GraphRAG's over-citation behavior is an architectural universality rather than a dataset-specific artifact. The authors demonstrate how faithfulness metrics are highly conditional on corpus structure, while proposing learned routers as a viable path to improve hop classification without relying solely on judge model stability. These findings establish essential benchmarks for validating retrieval-augmented generation systems across diverse data regimes and embedding backends.
Universal Pathologies, Conditional Consequences: A Triple-Robustness Analysis of RAG for Multi-Hop Traceability
arXiv:2608.05153v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: GraphRAG underperforms vector RAG on citation precision in many reports, but where and why have remained corpus-bound. We present a triple-robustness analysis that holds the retrieval architecture fixed and varies three orthogonal axes embedder (local e5-small -> Azure text-embedding-3-small), corpus (DO-178C typed-edge requirements -> Wikipedia paragraph chains via MuSiQue), and judge (paired GPT-5.4 x GPT-4.1) across 4,440 main-matrix runs, 600 cross-corpus runs, and 1,200 paired faithfulness judgments. (C2a) Over-citation is architecturally universal: GraphRAG emits 11-15 IDs per answer at citation precision 0.12-0.23 and retrieval recall 0.68-0.87 across all three settings. (C2b) Its faithfulness consequence is corpus-conditional: in typed-edge DO-178C, GraphRAG faithfulness collapses 74%->40% across hops; on Wikipedia chains the same pipeline rises 42%->58% because over-cited paragraphs remain topically supporting. (C1) Stratum-conditional winners are corpus-conditional but embedder-robust: vanilla wins 2-hop on DO-178C, GraphRAG wins 2-hop on MuSiQue, identical under either embedder. (C3) Single-judge LLM faithfulness is fragile to retrieval state: same-judge self-kappa across embedders is 0.137 for GPT-5.4 (verdict change on 41% of items). A learned router on dense embeddings alone reaches macro-F1 0.86 on hop classification (C4). We argue triple-robustness is the minimum bar for trustworthy RAG architecture claims.
Abstract:GraphRAG underperforms vector RAG on citation precision in many reports, but where and why have remained corpus-bound. We present a triple-robustness analysis that holds the retrieval architecture fixed and varies three orthogonal axes embedder (local e5-small -> Azure text-embedding-3-small), corpus (DO-178C typed-edge requirements -> Wikipedia paragraph chains via MuSiQue), and judge (paired GPT-5.4 x GPT-4.1) across 4,440 main-matrix runs, 600 cross-corpus runs, and 1,200 paired faithfulness judgments. (C2a) Over-citation is architecturally universal: GraphRAG emits 11-15 IDs per answer at citation precision 0.12-0.23 and retrieval recall 0.68-0.87 across all three settings. (C2b) Its faithfulness consequence is corpus-conditional: in typed-edge DO-178C, GraphRAG faithfulness collapses 74%->40% across hops; on Wikipedia chains the same pipeline rises 42%->58% because over-cited paragraphs remain topically supporting. (C1) Stratum-conditional winners are corpus-conditional but embedder-robust: vanilla wins 2-hop on DO-178C, GraphRAG wins 2-hop on MuSiQue, identical under either embedder. (C3) Single-judge LLM faithfulness is fragile to retrieval state: same-judge self-kappa across embedders is 0.137 for GPT-5.4 (verdict change on 41% of items). A learned router on dense embeddings alone reaches macro-F1 0.86 on hop classification (C4). We argue triple-robustness is the minimum bar for trustworthy RAG architecture claims.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.05153 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.05153v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.05153 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 285 words
