aiqbench analysis
Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.
Unified dynamics of training, learning, inference, and reinforcement in neural networks
arXiv:2611.01345v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite their remarkable success, neural networks remain largely black boxes, and the mechanisms underlying their behavior are still poorly understood. Nine nanoGPT experiments established training-learning-inference relations: realized updates elicit state-dependent finite-amplitude responses; learning persistently reorganizes distributed functional support, with target-specific readout-boundary crossings determining capability transitions; inference recruits learned support without changing the learned state. Factors identified in the fifth experiment yielded a direct predictor of post-update capability transitions, achieving 91.43% accuracy and 91.49% four-way macro recall across 5,088 targets. We tested these relations and prediction across five additional neural architectures. In a seventh system, concentrated correct feedback eroded previously mastered skills; rebalanced feedback restored their accuracy from 70.31% to 99.48%. Linking inference consequences to subsequent training closes these relations into unified training-learning-inference-reinforcement dynamics.
Read the full article at arXivRelated coverage
Active Inference as a Convex Markov Decision Process
arXiv · Jul 23, 2026
ACRL: Adaptive Control of Training-Inference Discrepancy for Stable Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · Jul 28, 2026
Open Materials Generation with Inference-Time Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026
CAPABLE: Capability-Aware Policy Adaptation via Behavioral Latent Encoding
arXiv · Oct 9, 2026