aiqbench analysis
This research investigates the aesthetic preferences of foundation models by analyzing their evaluations of K-pop music and videos, revealing stronger consensus in visual assessments than audio ones. The study also explores the correlation between these machine-generated rankings and real-world YouTube viewership data to inform future AI-assisted creative workflows.
Understanding Machine Taste: Aesthetic Agreement Across Foundation Models in K-pop
arXiv:2610.17731v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As foundation models enter creative industries, understanding their aesthetic preferences becomes an important step toward AI-assisted creative decision making. In this work, we investigate how foundation models evaluate creative content and characterize their ``machine taste'' using K-pop songs and music videos as a testbed. We formulate aesthetic evaluation as a pairwise ranking problem and systematically examine pairwise inter-model agreement, group-level consensus, and cross-modal preference alignment. Our results reveal stronger pairwise inter-model agreement and group-level consensus in visual evaluation than in audio evaluation, while preferences across the two modalities remain weakly aligned. We further examine how visual consensus rankings relate to real-world popularity using historical YouTube viewership data, finding positive but varying correlations across artist groups. These findings provide initial insights into machine aesthetic preferences and lay the groundwork for future AI-assisted creative decision making that considers creative content, artist identity, audience preferences, and market dynamics.
Abstract:As foundation models enter creative industries, understanding their aesthetic preferences becomes an important step toward AI-assisted creative decision making. In this work, we investigate how foundation models evaluate creative content and characterize their ``machine taste'' using K-pop songs and music videos as a testbed. We formulate aesthetic evaluation as a pairwise ranking problem and systematically examine pairwise inter-model agreement, group-level consensus, and cross-modal preference alignment. Our results reveal stronger pairwise inter-model agreement and group-level consensus in visual evaluation than in audio evaluation, while preferences across the two modalities remain weakly aligned. We further examine how visual consensus rankings relate to real-world popularity using historical YouTube viewership data, finding positive but varying correlations across artist groups. These findings provide initial insights into machine aesthetic preferences and lay the groundwork for future AI-assisted creative decision making that considers creative content, artist identity, audience preferences, and market dynamics.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.17731 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.17731v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17731 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 240 words
Related coverage

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · Jun 8, 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

Built Technologies builds an AI-powered document intelligence solution on AWS to power agents across real estate finance
AWS · Jul 15, 2026