aiqbench analysis
This research establishes the first gap-dependent regret bounds for LSVI-UCB++, demonstrating that its exploration costs are tight up to logarithmic factors within the class of optimism-based algorithms using linear function approximation. By proving structural lower bounds, the study confirms that the cubic dependence on horizon length and logarithmic dependence on episodes are intrinsic limitations for arbitrary learning algorithms in linear Markov decision processes. These findings provide a sharper theoretical characterization of the trade-offs between exploration efficiency and regret minimization in advanced RL frameworks.
Understanding Gap-Dependent Regret for Optimism-Based Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation
arXiv:2602.20297v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study gap-dependent regret for reinforcement learning with linear function approximation. While prior works have established gap-dependent guarantees in this setting, existing analyses do not apply to algorithms that achieve the nearly minimax-optimal worst-case regret bound $\tilde{O}(d\sqrt{H^3K})$, where $d$ is the feature dimension, $H$ is the horizon length, and $K$ is the number of episodes. We bridge this gap by establishing the first gap-dependent regret bound for the nearly minimax-optimal algorithm LSVI-UCB++ (He et al., 2023), with an expected regret bound $\tilde{O}(d^2H^3/\Delta_{\min}+d^6H^5)$, improving the dependence on both $d$ and $H$ in the leading gap-dependent term compared with previous results. To understand the exploration cost induced by optimism, we establish a structural lower bound $\Omega(d^2H^3/\Delta_{\min})$ for a broad class of algorithms based on persistent ellipsoidal optimism. When specialized to LSVI-UCB++, this result shows that the leading dependence of our upper bound on $d$, $H$, and $\Delta_{\min}$ is tight up to logarithmic factors. Beyond this algorithmic class, we establish a general gap-dependent lower bound $\Omega(dH^3\log K/\Delta_{\min})$ for arbitrary learning algorithms, showing that the logarithmic dependence on $K$ and the cubic dependence on $H$ are intrinsic to gap-dependent expected regret in linear MDPs. Together, our results substantially narrow the gap between upper and lower bounds and provide a sharper characterization of gap-dependent learning and optimism-based exploration with linear function approximation.
Abstract:We study gap-dependent regret for reinforcement learning with linear function approximation. While prior works have established gap-dependent guarantees in this setting, existing analyses do not apply to algorithms that achieve the nearly minimax-optimal worst-case regret bound $\tilde{O}(d\sqrt{H^3K})$, where $d$ is the feature dimension, $H$ is the horizon length, and $K$ is the number of episodes. We bridge this gap by establishing the first gap-dependent regret bound for the nearly minimax-optimal algorithm LSVI-UCB++ (He et al., 2023), with an expected regret bound $\tilde{O}(d^2H^3/\Delta_{\min}+d^6H^5)$, improving the dependence on both $d$ and $H$ in the leading gap-dependent term compared with previous results. To understand the exploration cost induced by optimism, we establish a structural lower bound $\Omega(d^2H^3/\Delta_{\min})$ for a broad class of algorithms based on persistent ellipsoidal optimism. When specialized to LSVI-UCB++, this result shows that the leading dependence of our upper bound on $d$, $H$, and $\Delta_{\min}$ is tight up to logarithmic factors. Beyond this algorithmic class, we establish a general gap-dependent lower bound $\Omega(dH^3\log K/\Delta_{\min})$ for arbitrary learning algorithms, showing that the logarithmic dependence on $K$ and the cubic dependence on $H$ are intrinsic to gap-dependent expected regret in linear MDPs. Together, our results substantially narrow the gap between upper and lower bounds and provide a sharper characterization of gap-dependent learning and optimism-based exploration with linear function approximation.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2602.20297 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2602.20297v2 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.20297 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 312 words
Related coverage

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 18, 2026

Jev: System One models for Prod, not God — with Diogo Almeida, CEO, TypeSafe AI
Latent Space · Sep 21, 2026
Contextual Online Uncertainty-Aware Preference Learning for Human Feedback
arXiv · Aug 26, 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026