Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper addresses the persistent instability of Deep Q-Learning by unifying three distinct sources of error in recursive value estimation rather than treating them as isolated issues. By deriving specific stabilization principles for bootstrapping and parameter dynamics, it offers a more robust framework applicable to complex environments like Atari-100K and Procgen.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Understanding and Stabilizing Deep Q-Learning via Controlled Bootstrapping and Regulated Value Dynamics

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.16182v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep Q-learning (DQL) has achieved remarkable empirical success in reinforcement learning, yet its training process remains notoriously unstable. Existing studies often attribute instability to isolated factors such as overestimation bias or representation learning issues, lacking a unified understanding of how different sources of instability interact during recursive value estimation. In this work, we provide a systematic analysis of instability in deep Q-learning from three complementary perspectives: operator-level bias in Bellman bootstrapping, estimator-level sensitivity of greedy action selection to regression noise, and parameter-dynamics imbalance under aggressive data reuse. We identify a reward-triggered self-reinforcing trap and characteristic parameter spike dynamics, then derive stabilization principles for controlled bootstrapping, ensemble quantile estimation, and spike-based parameter regulation. Experiments on Atari-100K and Procgen demonstrate competitive performance and improved training stability.

Abstract:Deep Q-learning (DQL) has achieved remarkable empirical success in reinforcement learning, yet its training process remains notoriously unstable. Existing studies often attribute instability to isolated factors such as overestimation bias or representation learning issues, lacking a unified understanding of how different sources of instability interact during recursive value estimation. In this work, we provide a systematic analysis of instability in deep Q-learning from three complementary perspectives: operator-level bias in Bellman bootstrapping, estimator-level sensitivity of greedy action selection to regression noise, and parameter-dynamics imbalance under aggressive data reuse. We identify a reward-triggered self-reinforcing trap and characteristic parameter spike dynamics, then derive stabilization principles for controlled bootstrapping, ensemble quantile estimation, and spike-based parameter regulation. Experiments on Atari-100K and Procgen demonstrate competitive performance and improved training stability.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.16182 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.16182v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16182 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 221 words

Related coverage