aiqbench analysis
This paper addresses the persistent instability of Deep Q-Learning by unifying three distinct sources of error in recursive value estimation rather than treating them as isolated issues. By deriving specific stabilization principles for bootstrapping and parameter dynamics, it offers a more robust framework applicable to complex environments like Atari-100K and Procgen.
Understanding and Stabilizing Deep Q-Learning via Controlled Bootstrapping and Regulated Value Dynamics
arXiv:2608.16182v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep Q-learning (DQL) has achieved remarkable empirical success in reinforcement learning, yet its training process remains notoriously unstable. Existing studies often attribute instability to isolated factors such as overestimation bias or representation learning issues, lacking a unified understanding of how different sources of instability interact during recursive value estimation. In this work, we provide a systematic analysis of instability in deep Q-learning from three complementary perspectives: operator-level bias in Bellman bootstrapping, estimator-level sensitivity of greedy action selection to regression noise, and parameter-dynamics imbalance under aggressive data reuse. We identify a reward-triggered self-reinforcing trap and characteristic parameter spike dynamics, then derive stabilization principles for controlled bootstrapping, ensemble quantile estimation, and spike-based parameter regulation. Experiments on Atari-100K and Procgen demonstrate competitive performance and improved training stability.
Abstract:Deep Q-learning (DQL) has achieved remarkable empirical success in reinforcement learning, yet its training process remains notoriously unstable. Existing studies often attribute instability to isolated factors such as overestimation bias or representation learning issues, lacking a unified understanding of how different sources of instability interact during recursive value estimation. In this work, we provide a systematic analysis of instability in deep Q-learning from three complementary perspectives: operator-level bias in Bellman bootstrapping, estimator-level sensitivity of greedy action selection to regression noise, and parameter-dynamics imbalance under aggressive data reuse. We identify a reward-triggered self-reinforcing trap and characteristic parameter spike dynamics, then derive stabilization principles for controlled bootstrapping, ensemble quantile estimation, and spike-based parameter regulation. Experiments on Atari-100K and Procgen demonstrate competitive performance and improved training stability.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.16182 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.16182v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16182 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 221 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · Jun 8, 2026

OpenRouter: from Seed to Stripe — with OpenRouter’s Alex Atallah & AMP’s Anjney Midha
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026