aiqbench analysis
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models exhibit significant vulnerability to joint-level physical faults, such as actuator degradation and friction, which disrupt the closed-loop execution between commanded actions and realized motion. The study demonstrates that performance degradation occurs even under physically feasible fault conditions, necessitating adaptive correction beyond simple infeasibility checks. To address this, the authors introduce J-PARC, a lightweight residual calibration framework that infers fault regimes from joint dynamics to maintain robustness without compromising performance in fault-free environments.
Uncovering Vulnerability of Vision-Language-Action Models under Joint-Level Physical Faults
arXiv:2606.10501v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deploying Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models in real robotic systems requires robustness not only to semantic and perceptual variations, but also to embodiment-side faults that change how actions are physically realized. Real robots can experience joint-level changes caused by actuator degradation, hardware faults, safety limits, collision damage, or wear-induced friction. These faults are critical because they alter the action-to-motion interface of a policy, disrupting the learned closed-loop relationship between commanded actions, realized motion, and subsequent observations. In this work, we study realistic joint-level physical faults and show that VLA models are vulnerable when predicted actions are executed through a perturbed robot body. Our analysis reveals joint-dependent effects, with heterogeneous degradation in task success across affected joints. We also show that performance drops cannot be attributed solely to physical infeasibility, since feasible faults such as increased joint friction can still substantially reduce success rates and induce closed-loop execution mismatch. Motivated by these findings, we propose Joint-level Physical-fault Aware Residual Calibrator (J-PARC), a lightweight residual calibration framework built on top of a frozen VLA policy. J-PARC infers a latent joint-fault regime from recent joint dynamics and conditions a shared residual calibrator on this regime, enabling adaptive action correction across faulty joints. Experiments show that J-PARC improves robustness under joint-level faults while preserving fault-free environment performance.
Abstract:Deploying Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models in real robotic systems requires robustness not only to semantic and perceptual variations, but also to embodiment-side faults that change how actions are physically realized. Real robots can experience joint-level changes caused by actuator degradation, hardware faults, safety limits, collision damage, or wear-induced friction. These faults are critical because they alter the action-to-motion interface of a policy, disrupting the learned closed-loop relationship between commanded actions, realized motion, and subsequent observations. In this work, we study realistic joint-level physical faults and show that VLA models are vulnerable when predicted actions are executed through a perturbed robot body. Our analysis reveals joint-dependent effects, with heterogeneous degradation in task success across affected joints. We also show that performance drops cannot be attributed solely to physical infeasibility, since feasible faults such as increased joint friction can still substantially reduce success rates and induce closed-loop execution mismatch. Motivated by these findings, we propose Joint-level Physical-fault Aware Residual Calibrator (J-PARC), a lightweight residual calibration framework built on top of a frozen VLA policy. J-PARC infers a latent joint-fault regime from recent joint dynamics and conditions a shared residual calibrator on this regime, enabling adaptive action correction across faulty joints. Experiments show that J-PARC improves robustness under joint-level faults while preserving fault-free environment performance.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2606.10501 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2606.10501v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.10501 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 304 words
Related coverage
Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026
BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026
Exploiting Vulnerabilities: Universal Adversarial Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models in Robotics
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026