aiqbench analysis
This research identifies "cross-objective interference" as a critical failure mode in multi-objective LLM alignment, where optimizing one goal inadvertently degrades others during scalarized training. The authors derive a local covariance law to explain this phenomenon and introduce COVER, a novel reweighting controller that mitigates interference without sacrificing performance on co-improving objectives. By linking these dynamics to model geometry and convergence conditions, the study provides essential theoretical insights for advancing robust multi-task alignment strategies.
Uncovering Cross-Objective Interference in Multi-Objective Alignment
arXiv:2602.06869v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study a persistent failure mode in multi-objective alignment for large language models (LLMs), in which scalarized training improves only some objectives while the others degrade. We formalize this phenomenon as cross-objective interference and, to our knowledge, conduct the first systematic study of scalarization algorithms for multi-objective LLM alignment. The study shows that interference is pervasive across algorithms yet strongly model-dependent. To understand how interference arises, we derive a local covariance law stating that an objective improves or degrades at first order according to the sign of the covariance between its reward and the scalarized score. We extend this law to the clipped surrogate objectives of modern reinforcement fine-tuning and show that it still holds under mild conditions. Building on this law, we propose COVariance-floor Enforced Reweighting (COVER), a one-sided controller that raises an objective's weight only when the covariance between its reward and the clipped advantage weight falls below a target. Through extensive experiments, we find that COVER can mitigate cross-objective interference while matching linear scalarization when objectives already co-improve. Finally, to explain why interference is model-dependent, we complement the local covariance law with a global convergence analysis. This analysis gives sufficient conditions for the non-convex scalarized objective to satisfy the Polyak--\L{}ojasiewicz condition and relates interference to model geometry.
Abstract:We study a persistent failure mode in multi-objective alignment for large language models (LLMs), in which scalarized training improves only some objectives while the others degrade. We formalize this phenomenon as cross-objective interference and, to our knowledge, conduct the first systematic study of scalarization algorithms for multi-objective LLM alignment. The study shows that interference is pervasive across algorithms yet strongly model-dependent. To understand how interference arises, we derive a local covariance law stating that an objective improves or degrades at first order according to the sign of the covariance between its reward and the scalarized score. We extend this law to the clipped surrogate objectives of modern reinforcement fine-tuning and show that it still holds under mild conditions. Building on this law, we propose COVariance-floor Enforced Reweighting (COVER), a one-sided controller that raises an objective's weight only when the covariance between its reward and the clipped advantage weight falls below a target. Through extensive experiments, we find that COVER can mitigate cross-objective interference while matching linear scalarization when objectives already co-improve. Finally, to explain why interference is model-dependent, we complement the local covariance law with a global convergence analysis. This analysis gives sufficient conditions for the non-convex scalarized objective to satisfy the Polyak--Łojasiewicz condition and relates interference to model geometry.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2602.06869 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2602.06869v3 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.06869 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 306 words
Related coverage

LiveLaw Supreme Court Half-Yearly Digest: January - June 2026 [Part 2]
livelaw.in · Sep 13, 2026
Understanding Helpfulness and Harmless Tension in Reward Models
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026
aiXamine: Unified Black-Box Evaluation of Cross-Dimensional Trade-offs in LLM Safety, Security, and Privacy
arXiv · Aug 24, 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026