Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper defends the physical reality of Hilbert space against recent critiques, proposing a hierarchical framework that distinguishes between ontological and operational interpretations of quantum states. By linking these concepts to modal metaphysics, the author offers a new perspective on resolving interpretational ambiguities in quantum field theory arising from inequivalent representations. The work advances foundational debates within quantum mechanics rather than addressing applied AI or quantum computing systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Unbounded Operators, Physicality, and Modality in Quantum Theories

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.28136v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this paper, I address the problem regarding the physicality of Hilbert space in quantum mechanics, a topic brought into focus by Carcassi et al.'s paper "The unphysicality of Hilbert spaces" recently. I argue for the physicality of the Hilbert space in quantum mechanics, and demonstrate that there are inevitable ambiguity and arbitrariness if we want to identify the set of physical states with a proper subset of it. Moreover, I distinguish the ontological and modal reading of physicality from the pragmatic and operational reading of physicality, and then develop what I call the hierarchical view of physicality. According to this view, physicality is not a monolithic concept, but a layered one that admits degrees. I show the connection between the concept of physicality and modal metaphysics, and finally explain how it can be used to address the interpretational problem of quantum field theory brought by the existence of inequivalent representations.

Abstract:In this paper, I address the problem regarding the physicality of Hilbert space in quantum mechanics, a topic brought into focus by Carcassi et al.'s paper "The unphysicality of Hilbert spaces" recently. I argue for the physicality of the Hilbert space in quantum mechanics, and demonstrate that there are inevitable ambiguity and arbitrariness if we want to identify the set of physical states with a proper subset of it. Moreover, I distinguish the ontological and modal reading of physicality from the pragmatic and operational reading of physicality, and then develop what I call the hierarchical view of physicality. According to this view, physicality is not a monolithic concept, but a layered one that admits degrees. I show the connection between the concept of physicality and modal metaphysics, and finally explain how it can be used to address the interpretational problem of quantum field theory brought by the existence of inequivalent representations.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)

arXiv:2609.28136 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.28136v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.28136 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words

Related coverage