Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper challenges the prevailing view of federated learning as a performance compromise, demonstrating instead that decentralized training significantly boosts model robustness and generalization in document analysis tasks like handwriting recognition and table detection. By systematically evaluating architectures and fine-tuning strategies across diverse environments, the study provides critical evidence that privacy-preserving decentralization is a viable path to overcoming legal constraints in sectors like government and healthcare.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Unapologetically Distributed: A Call for Decentralized Document Analysis

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.39684v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Privacy has become an increasingly important concern in the Document Analysis community, to the extent that in many environments such as archives, governmental institutions, and local businesses, the adoption of automation is restricted by legal and policy constraints. While federated learning has often been regarded as a ``necessary evil'', implying an unavoidable performance trade-off in exchange for decentralization and privacy, many prior works overlook its potential to improve robustness to out-of-distribution data. In this paper, we present Unapologetically Distributed, the first comprehensive study evaluating distributed learning in Document Analysis along three key axes simultaneously: the tasks addressed, the architectures employed, and the fine-tuning strategies applied. Specifically, we demonstrate how various distributed training approaches enhance generalization capabilities across diverse tasks such as Table Recognition, handwriting recognition, and Word Spotting, particularly during transfer learning stages. Our results provide strong evidence that decentralization is not merely a constraint, but a valuable opportunity to improve model robustness and adaptability in real-world Document Analysis scenarios.

Abstract:Privacy has become an increasingly important concern in the Document Analysis community, to the extent that in many environments such as archives, governmental institutions, and local businesses, the adoption of automation is restricted by legal and policy constraints. While federated learning has often been regarded as a ``necessary evil'', implying an unavoidable performance trade-off in exchange for decentralization and privacy, many prior works overlook its potential to improve robustness to out-of-distribution data. In this paper, we present Unapologetically Distributed, the first comprehensive study evaluating distributed learning in Document Analysis along three key axes simultaneously: the tasks addressed, the architectures employed, and the fine-tuning strategies applied. Specifically, we demonstrate how various distributed training approaches enhance generalization capabilities across diverse tasks such as Table Recognition, handwriting recognition, and Word Spotting, particularly during transfer learning stages. Our results provide strong evidence that decentralization is not merely a constraint, but a valuable opportunity to improve model robustness and adaptability in real-world Document Analysis scenarios.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.39684 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.39684v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.39684 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 260 words

Related coverage